Re: Patches versus Pull Requests

Thanks John. I will look at ways to rewrite these sections to reflect current practices and preferences. It probably will mostly entail switching the sequence of information (putting pull requests first), and then offloading the details of the patch process into a separate page for those still

Re: Patches versus Pull Requests

+1, it's a lot easier to just format-patch and send it to some place related to the project than using GitHub. :) ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Re: Patches versus Pull Requests

> On Jul 27, 2017, at 9:45 AM, David T. via gnucash-devel > wrote: > > Hello, > > In going over some of the wiki information, I ran into a section that goes > into some detail about preparing patches for submission. > > While this is, no doubt, still a valid way

Patches versus Pull Requests

Hello, In going over some of the wiki information, I ran into a section that goes into some detail about preparing patches for submission. While this is, no doubt, still a valid way of submitting changes, is this: a) how the project prefers such changes to be submitted, and b) something that