On 13 February 2010 11:45, Kim Wood kim.w...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
The has been some discussion in the user forum at
http://n4.nabble.com/New-Transaction-field-in-the-register-td1476778.html#a1476778
about patch r18428. IMHO this patch is particularly bad and should be
removed for two
On Sunday 14 February 2010, Colin Law wrote:
On 13 February 2010 11:45, Kim Wood kim.w...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
The has been some discussion in the user forum at
http://n4.nabble.com/New-Transaction-field-in-the-register-td1476778.html
#a1476778 about patch r18428. IMHO this patch is
Thanks Geert,
I hope the original patch writer does not get discouraged by this. The
patch just needs to include the option to disable the feature to be useful.
And by default, to be off.
Regards,
Kim Wood
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Please-back-out-r18428
user friendly?
Regards,
Kim Wood
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Please-back-out-r18428-editable-2nd-date-field-tp1554271p1554271.html
Sent from the GnuCash - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
I have to strongly second this request. In my opinion, this is a
half-complete feature.
At a minimum, until there is a preference setting available, in my
opinion, this should not be part of the trunk.
Arguably, until sorting and searching is also available on the new
field, similar to the
On 02/13/2010 06:45 AM, Kim Wood wrote:
[...]
Am I alone in thinking that the register in double line mode now looks less
user friendly?
I'm not a developer but I agree with you completely.
--
Volker Englisch
mailto:vol...@englisch.us
___
