Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
Derek Atkins (warl...@mit.edu) said:
Speaking solely for myself, I'm OK with leaving RHEL 5 at 2.2.x and pushing
2.4.x into the next version of RHEL/EPEL. But I'm not 100% sure how many
users we have on RHEL 5 that would want a newer version.
On Tuesday 26 January 2010, Geert Janssens wrote:
In an attempt to check if the glade-3 generated files still work on
Centos/RHEL5, I tried to build the current trunk on a fully updated Centos
5.
I didn't get that far though. GC trunk requires swig = 1.3.31. Centos 5
ships with swig
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
To answer my own question, I found this in config.in:
# We need at least version 1.3.31 of SWIG because
# that's when SWIG doesn't barf on the inline keyword in C headers anymore
If swig 1.3.31 is indeed required, then CentOS/RHEL is not
On Tuesday 26 January 2010, Derek Atkins wrote:
True, EL5 isn't a dev platform, but you don't need swig to build from
the tarball. On some other (more recent) platform run:
make dist
then tar the tarball to EL5 and then you can build it there.. Or at
least you should be able to.
Geert Janssens (janssens-ge...@telenet.be) said:
RHEL as target platform is in serious trouble...
1. There's no packaged webkit for RHEL5/EPEL
2. RHEL5 (base) ships libdbi 0.8.1, but GnuCash uses DBI_DECIMAL_SIZEMASK a
constant that is only defined starting from libdbi 0.8.2.
I'm not
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
That was exactly my next step.
RHEL as target platform is in serious trouble...
1. There's no packaged webkit for RHEL5/EPEL
2. RHEL5 (base) ships libdbi 0.8.1, but GnuCash uses DBI_DECIMAL_SIZEMASK a
constant that is only defined starting
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
Speaking solely for myself, I'm OK with leaving RHEL 5 at 2.2.x and pushing
2.4.x into the next version of RHEL/EPEL. But I'm not 100% sure how many
users we have on RHEL 5 that would want a newer version.
When is EL6 due?
Could we still release 2.4
On Tuesday 26 January 2010, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
That was exactly my next step.
RHEL as target platform is in serious trouble...
1. There's no packaged webkit for RHEL5/EPEL
2. RHEL5 (base) ships libdbi 0.8.1, but GnuCash uses
Derek Atkins (warl...@mit.edu) said:
Speaking solely for myself, I'm OK with leaving RHEL 5 at 2.2.x and pushing
2.4.x into the next version of RHEL/EPEL. But I'm not 100% sure how many
users we have on RHEL 5 that would want a newer version.
When is EL6 due?
I am not at liberty to
, 2010 11:26:28 AM
Subject: Re: GnuCash on CentOS 5 (libdbi too recent)
On Tuesday 26 January 2010, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
That was exactly my next step.
RHEL as target platform is in serious trouble...
1. There's no packaged webkit for RHEL5
On Tuesday 26 January 2010, Phil Longstaff wrote:
or RHEL sticks with gtkhtml
It may very well go this direction.
I tried to build webkit but didn't manage to do so yet.
Someone with more experience with webkit may have a stab at it.
I'll look at the libdbi issue.
Great!
Phil
11 matches
Mail list logo
