Zitat von Derek Atkins de...@ihtfp.com:
As for the 2.5.0 tag: You've removed the line from the correct tag file. I
don't know why it didn't run. I did the same thing a few minutes ago: I
removed the 2.5.0 line from the file c:\soft\packaging\tags and ran the
build_tags.sh script in that
Christian Stimming christ...@cstimming.de writes:
Zitat von Derek Atkins de...@ihtfp.com:
As for the 2.5.0 tag: You've removed the line from the correct tag file. I
don't know why it didn't run. I did the same thing a few minutes ago: I
removed the 2.5.0 line from the file
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
On zo 31 mrt 2013 23:06:12 EDT, Derek Atkins de...@ihtfp.com wrote:
Looks like the 2.4.12 build finished, built the setup, but still failed
and didn't copy the .exe or build log to the server. The end of the log
file says:
Shutdown error:
Zitat von Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu:
@Derek: Can you remove the c:\soft\gnome directory and trigger the
normal build manually? If the gnome directory has a problem, we will
see the same error in the normal build's output then.
Yep, just did that and look, it failed. :) The error was
Christian Stimming christ...@cstimming.de writes:
Zitat von Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu:
@Derek: Can you remove the c:\soft\gnome directory and trigger the
normal build manually? If the gnome directory has a problem, we will
see the same error in the normal build's output then.
Yep, just
Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu writes:
Ok, r22864 is the next try. In February, the pixman installation was
removed, but one final check for it still remained.
Can you trigger the build again? No need to remove anything tho.
Christian
Triggered, and it definitely made it past the gnome
Zitat von Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu:
Triggered, and it definitely made it past the gnome step. Right now
it's building the gnucash code itself so I would call it progress.
If this succeeds then we probably need to re-tag 2.5.0. I'll keep an
eye out and send another message.
FYI, trunk
Christian Stimming christ...@cstimming.de writes:
Zitat von Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu:
Triggered, and it definitely made it past the gnome step. Right now
it's building the gnucash code itself so I would call it progress.
If this succeeds then we probably need to re-tag 2.5.0. I'll keep
On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Christian Stimming christ...@cstimming.de writes:
Zitat von Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu:
Triggered, and it definitely made it past the gnome step. Right now
it's building the gnucash code itself so I would call it progress.
On Tue, April 2, 2013 12:57 pm, John Ralls wrote:
On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Christian Stimming christ...@cstimming.de writes:
Zitat von Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu:
Triggered, and it definitely made it past the gnome step. Right now
it's building
On Apr 2, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Derek Atkins de...@ihtfp.com wrote:
On Tue, April 2, 2013 12:57 pm, John Ralls wrote:
On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu wrote:
Christian Stimming christ...@cstimming.de writes:
Zitat von Derek Atkins warl...@mit.edu:
Triggered, and
On Tue, April 2, 2013 1:44 pm, John Ralls wrote:
OK, Retagged. I'll proceed with everything else this afternoon -- I have
to go to an appointment now.
That's fine. I'll fire it off if I get the chance, or just let it fire
itself tonight..
ISTM we'll want one more 2.4 release this summer,
On Tue, April 2, 2013 1:44 pm, John Ralls wrote:
ISTM we'll want one more 2.4 release this summer, so it would be good to
get it fixed. Do we know for sure that what's wrong there isn't also
broken on trunk/2.5?
Actually, I was wrong. The 2.4 branch build did copy over. Mea Culpa. I
was
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 13:41:38 schrieb John Ralls:
Author: jralls
Date: 2013-04-02 13:41:37 -0400 (Tue, 02 Apr 2013)
New Revision: 22865
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/22865
Added:
gnucash/tags/2.5.0/trunk/
I think there's one trunk too much in here. You probably got
On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:08 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 13:41:38 schrieb John Ralls:
Author: jralls
Date: 2013-04-02 13:41:37 -0400 (Tue, 02 Apr 2013)
New Revision: 22865
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/22865
Added:
gnucash/tags/2.5.0/trunk/
I
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 16:17:49 schrieb Derek Atkins:
On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:08 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 13:41:38 schrieb John Ralls:
Author: jralls
Date: 2013-04-02 13:41:37 -0400 (Tue, 02 Apr 2013)
New Revision: 22865
Trac:
On Apr 2, 2013, at 1:21 PM, Christian Stimming christ...@cstimming.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 16:17:49 schrieb Derek Atkins:
On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:08 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 13:41:38 schrieb John Ralls:
Author: jralls
Date: 2013-04-02 13:41:37
On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:21 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 16:17:49 schrieb Derek Atkins:
On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:08 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 13:41:38 schrieb John Ralls:
Author: jralls
Date: 2013-04-02 13:41:37 -0400 (Tue, 02 Apr
Hi Guy's,
I thought 2.5.0 was being released in mid April so was not checking
activity. I have several blocker bugs with patches on them that may be a
good idea for this release or .1 the last containing a patch to check old
and new registers being opened at the same time which I think was
On Apr 2, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Robert Fewell 14ubo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guy's,
I thought 2.5.0 was being released in mid April so was not checking
activity. I have several blocker bugs with patches on them that may be a
good idea for this release or .1 the last containing a patch to check
Hi,
I have been trying to build GnuCash on Windows and hit quite a few issues
on the way.
I notice that there are two places where there are details on how to build
on Windows as follows:
Onc is
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Windows#Instructions_for_an_.28almost.29_automated_build
The other is
On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:34 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
That would explain why the build failed with the same error.
I deleted the old 2.5.0 tree and reran the build yet again,
but I suspect it might fail again
I've just committed the tag again, this time hopefully correct. Can you
On Apr 2, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Derek Atkins de...@ihtfp.com wrote:
On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:34 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
That would explain why the build failed with the same error.
I deleted the old 2.5.0 tree and reran the build yet again,
but I suspect it might fail again
I've
23 matches
Mail list logo
