Thanks,
Makes me wish Dave P. was still around
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
> You forgot to mention -L as well. :-)
No, I just didn't mention it because presumably gcc is already being called
with -L/opt/local/lib (see output of configure you sent). I meant, perhaps
configure should be adding -R as well, but only when compiling under Solaris.
Regards,
Dan W.
> > On So
This is a shot in the dark, but in my Solaris days I recall using
-R/opt/local/lib (in this case) to tell the dynamic loader where to look for
the shared objects. Would it help to add -R/opt/local/lib when compiling
under Solaris?
You forgot to mention -L as well. :-)
ftp.gnome.org on
Hi,
The recent announcement of Google's participation lead me to review
the list of packages considered to be a part of the "Linux Envirnonment
Component". (http://www.openinventionnetwork.com/pat_linuxdefpop.html)
I noticed the absence of one notable package, GnuCash, and was lead
to wondering
This is a shot in the dark, but in my Solaris days I recall using
-R/opt/local/lib (in this case) to tell the dynamic loader where to look for
the shared objects. Would it help to add -R/opt/local/lib when compiling
under Solaris?
Dan W.
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 03:52:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED
Not sure if this will make any sense, but here goes.
On Solaris, the configure script finds gnome-libs as shown below:
checking GNOME_LIBS... -L/opt/local/lib -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2
-lxml2 -lz -lsocket -lnsl -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lart_lgpl_2
-lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0
Mike or Penny Novack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> account name with an asterisk in it. Can anybody here identify the
> address of the team working on "gnome for Windows" because they should
> be made aware that there is a problem affecting their project.
>
> The implication is that the problem i
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2007, 12:16 -0400 schrieb Mike or Penny Novack:
[snip]
> The implication is that the problem isn't FIXABLE (can't make GnuCash
> work completely properly for all legal Windows user account names) but
> that doesn't mean it should be "no action". One possibility would b
>>
>>
>[[Maybe a bit off-topic for this mailinglist, but I thought it could give some
>additional background]]
>
>... and some are already. A fine example is The Gimp (http://www.gimp.org),
>an alternative image manipulation program for Photoshop. Whether it truly can
>replace Photoshop is
On Wednesday 8 August 2007 14:55, Dan Widyono wrote:
> > What "leverage"? You imagine that any of these would be there in a
> > Windows user's c:\documents and setting\userID (the Windows XP
> > equivalent of $HOME/ ) for some other purpose than holding GnuCash data?
> > I think I see what the prob
> What "leverage"? You imagine that any of these would be there in a
> Windows user's c:\documents and setting\userID (the Windows XP
> equivalent of $HOME/ ) for some other purpose than holding GnuCash data?
> I think I see what the problem might be and why hard to fix. This .gconf
> stuff isn
>
>Uh, I'm not sure exactly what you mean, but GnuCash does (should) create a
>$HOME/.gnucash/ dir for its own storage, as well as leveraging the
>$HOME/.gconf/ storage we've talked about.
>
>
>
Sorry -- but I don't understand.
Yes, I see that GnuCash has created a directory named .gnucash
(pr
On 8/7/07, Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andreas Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So, I would like to offer myself as a potential successor of yours as
> > Release Manager. I have not yet added any great feature to GnuCash and
>
> I think you'd do a great job, Andreas ... fwiw, yo
13 matches
Mail list logo
