I trust that everyone noticed that we released the first 3.90x test release
this evening. We're aiming to release 4.0 on 28 June and there will be a final
3.11 release of the 3.x branch at the same time. We don't want to risk blowing
anything up in that last release, so please commit to maint
Am 28.04.20 um 02:58 schrieb John Ralls:
:
> Documentation
>
> Concurrent with the release of Gnucash 3.902 we're pleased to also release a
> new version 3.902 of the companion Help and Tutorial and Concepts Guide.
> There are no differences between this and the previous 3.10 release.
I see 2
On April 26, 2020 6:21:52 PM UTC, Geert Janssens
wrote:
>Did you uninstall the result of "ninja install" before running the
>second test ?
No, silly me. If I uninstall first, I get the same error. The binaries must be
looking in the install directory instead of the build directory.
I guess
Finally found the source of my problem - setting the default currency for the
reports in the Edit-Preferences->Reports tab. this is new territory for me.
-
David Cousens
--
Sent from: http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/GnuCash-Dev-f1435356.html
That is a giant step forward!
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020, 7:59 PM John Ralls wrote:
> The GnuCash development team announces GnuCash 3.902, the first testing
> release for what will soon be GnuCash 4.0.
>
> Changes
>
> Baseline requirements
>
> Operating Systems:
>
> • Linux: Ubuntu 18.04LTS
The GnuCash development team announces GnuCash 3.902, the first testing release
for what will soon be GnuCash 4.0.
Changes
Baseline requirements
Operating Systems:
• Linux: Ubuntu 18.04LTS
• MacOS: 10.13
• Windows: 8.1
Software Dependencies:
• C++ standard is
> as translator I have a problem with "Inflow to" in this context. I had
> only expected "Inflow from" and "Outflow to".
>
> Frank
Good point. Should just use Inflow and Outflow to avoid nonsense terms.
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
> On Apr 27, 2020, at 12:55 PM, c.holterm...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I get error messages on closing. I have seen that for some days on
> master and maint. The most recent maint leads to a segmentation fault on
> quitting gnucash. Using the python bindings in a script I get
>
>> double
I do some testing this evening.
Regards,
Adrien
> On Apr 27, 2020 w18d118, at 3:51 PM, Christopher Lam
> wrote:
>
> Labelling issues aside, is there anyone who would be willing to beta test?
>
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
Labelling issues aside, is there anyone who would be willing to beta test?
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, 2:59 am Adrien Monteleone, <
adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net> wrote:
> Thanks Phil, so I’m not completely insane then.
>
> I too try to remember to factor in signs because GnuCash works that way. I
>
Saved configurations, the following can apply:
Most relevant options are transferred unchanged eg account selection, dates
chosen.
Options which are not present in upgraded reports are ignored.
New options are set to a useful value by default.
The layout of most upgraded reports will be
Thanks Phil, so I’m not completely insane then.
I too try to remember to factor in signs because GnuCash works that way. I was
just throwing in my 2¢ for taking a step back for perspective that maybe can be
considered in a future release. (5.0 maybe?)
As for danger in generating confusion, the
I agree with what you say about positive and negative with respect to
budgeting assets and liabilities. However, if I have a transaction which
pays down a loan, and then add that loan to the budget report, the actual
value is displayed as negative. That is why I budget paying down a loan
with a
I noticed that odd as well. I also noticed it to be odd to choose ‘Inflow’ for
anything but income.
However, I’m not sure the preface ‘Inflow from’ or ‘Outflow to’ should even be
there. It produces too much confusion with signs.
Now I have to be concerned with interpreting the sign to be the
What happens to saved configs of old reports?
Does GC choke when you try to run one?
Is an error message generated?
If the reports are renamed (and maybe relocated) will this auto-map so the
configs still work? Or will that just blow them up entirely anyway?
I’ll presume the configs won’t
Hi,
Am 27.04.20 um 06:08 schrieb Christopher Lam:
> [image: budget-view.png]
as translator I have a problem with "Inflow to" in this context. I had
only expected "Inflow from" and "Outflow to".
Frank
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
Thank you Phil.
I'm sure you know the issue with existing budgets - they do not behave as
expected when the Estimate tool is used to pre-fill cells, when
sign-reverse isn't credit-accounts.
There is *another* issue (not documented afaik in bugzilla) about budgets:
the totals do not total
Hi Chris,
thanks for taking this on. I am sorry I don't have more time to commit to
the project.
I don't like the terms "Outflow to Asset" and "Inflow to Liability".
For Assets, here is how I see a budget being used.
If I want to plan to put money into savings (an asset), I will have a
budget
18 matches
Mail list logo
