On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 02:43:25PM -0400, Eric Siegerman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:24:35PM +0200, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > It think it's worth reporting as a bug, though of low priority.
>
> Done: https://[deleted]
The emojis in my bug report screwed up my previous attempt to
submit
> On Apr 27, 2018, at 11:43 AM, Eric Siegerman wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:24:35PM +0200, Geert Janssens wrote:
>> It think it's worth reporting as a bug, though of low priority.
>
> Done: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795613
Well, half-done. You
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 03:24:35PM +0200, Geert Janssens wrote:
> It think it's worth reporting as a bug, though of low priority.
Done: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795613
Thanks,
- Eric
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
Op zaterdag 7 april 2018 22:26:52 CEST schreef Eric Siegerman:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 07:31:38AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> > > On Apr 6, 2018, at 11:11 PM, Wm via gnucash-devel
> > > wrote: gnc 3.0 allows emojis in places I
> > > think inappropriate
>
> In poking
On 08/04/2018 07:30, Eric Siegerman wrote:
sensible world view stuff that shouldn't have to be said
[*] We call our numerals "Arabic", but most(?) of the Arab world
actually uses different ones -- somewhat related to ours, but not
closely enough to be very legible to my Anglo eyes. I believe
On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 08:20:35PM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> Depends on what you see as the bug.
The bug is the inconsistency. I have opinions, for what they're
worth, on how it should behave:
- Reverting to the old value is better than clobbering to zero;
if it can't change the field to
> On Apr 7, 2018, at 1:26 PM, Eric Siegerman wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 07:31:38AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
>>> On Apr 6, 2018, at 11:11 PM, Wm via gnucash-devel
>>> wrote:
>>> gnc 3.0 allows emojis in places I think inappropriate
>
>