This is a really strange discussion ...
Am 12.04.2018 um 17:01 schrieb Wm via gnucash-devel:
<...>
Disagree strongly. Show me a swastika and I have an emotion. Don't care if it
is new amerika Trump supporters or not ... and I'm not from a jewish background.
Why can you not see that these
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 8:01 AM, Wm via gnucash-devel
> wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2018 04:38, John Ralls wrote:
>
>> Well, I suppose that’s always a concern with pictographs, eh? The standard
>
> *the* standard ?
https://www.unicode.org/standard/standard.html
On 08/04/2018 04:38, John Ralls wrote:
Well, I suppose that’s always a concern with pictographs, eh? The standard
*the* standard ?
specifies a description, in a few words of English, of what each code point is supposed to represent.
*supposed* to
> After that it’s up to the artist
> On Apr 7, 2018, at 1:08 PM, Wm via gnucash-devel
> wrote:
>
> On 07/04/2018 19:50, Buddha Buck wrote:
>
> [much snipped]
>
> thanks to JohnR too, BB's message was more fun to reply to
>
;-),
[SNIP]
>>> half for fun is this (.)(.) female breasts, an
On 07/04/2018 19:50, Buddha Buck wrote:
[much snipped]
thanks to JohnR too, BB's message was more fun to reply to
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 2:12 AM Wm via gnucash-devel <
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org> wrote:
Perhaps, but I don't think it is GnuCash's place to dictate that.
Besides, until the
On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 07:31:38AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
> > On Apr 6, 2018, at 11:11 PM, Wm via gnucash-devel
> > wrote:
> > gnc 3.0 allows emojis in places I think inappropriate
> > account names
> > account codes
> > securities
> Filtering for meaning is Way Too
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 2:12 AM Wm via gnucash-devel <
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org> wrote:
> background:
>
> gnc 3.0 allows emojis in places I think inappropriate
>
> e.g.
>
> account names
> account codes
> securities
>
I do not think it is GnuCash's place to dictate what is "appropriate" or
not
> On Apr 6, 2018, at 11:11 PM, Wm via gnucash-devel
> wrote:
>
> background:
>
> gnc 3.0 allows emojis in places I think inappropriate
>
> e.g.
>
> account names
> account codes
> securities
>
> and offers them in places it shouldn't
>
> e.g.
>
> dates
>
background:
gnc 3.0 allows emojis in places I think inappropriate
e.g.
account names
account codes
securities
and offers them in places it shouldn't
e.g.
dates
numbers
===
the thing I'm wondering about is if I am totally out of date or just
being realistic.
Argument A: emojis are