On 12/28/22 14:05, Stan Brown wrote:
It's a bit irritating to be told that something is preventing save, but
not told what that something is. (Reminds me of the story, hopefully
apocryphal, of a C compiler that had only one error message, "Syntax
Error", with no indication of where.)
Saw that
On 2022-12-28 13:09, David Carlson wrote:
> Over the years I have filed more than one bug report looking at various
> aspects of the issue of not being able to ascertain which pending edit was
> preventing the manual file save action, but today I was only able to find
> this one:
Over the years I have filed more than one bug report looking at various
aspects of the issue of not being able to ascertain which pending edit was
preventing the manual file save action, but today I was only able to find
this one: https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686051. There should
be
There are times when I want to check the accounts list in the middle of
entering a transaction, and I have occasionally (to verify amounts) wanted
to check with another register. I'd be okay with the change below as long
as there were three, not two choices: 1) Save changes 2) Discard the
I occasionally look at other registers and may even do Finds before
committing a transaction.
I do get a warning about wanting to save changes if I attempt to exit
the register being edited, attempt to edit an already committed
transaction in two different registers at once, or when exiting
I disagree, I find this feature quite useful from time to time.
Regards
Geoff
=
On 28/12/2022 12:05 pm, William Prescott wrote:
Let me guess: you looked in the other register before you had committed
the transaction.
Yes, you are probably right
That highlights a point about
>
>> Let me guess: you looked in the other register before you had committed
>> the transaction.
>
>
> Yes, you are probably right
>
That highlights a point about Gnucash function that I find annoying. It will
let you switch registers in the middle of editing a transaction, leaving the
