Thanks! You made me a fisherman. ./configure has now completed. The cmake
instructions talked about optional switches like python. I didn't see
anything like that mentioned in the output from configure. have I missed
something?
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 11:57 PM Geert Janssens
wrote:
> Op maandag
Op maandag 3 september 2018 22:41:50 CEST schreef Paul Schwartz:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I have been working through ./configure adding
> new packages as it complains [including -dev ones]. I have now hit this
>
> checking for webkit-1.0 >= "1.2"... no
> Package webkit-1.0 was not found in
Thanks for the suggestion. I have been working through ./configure adding
new packages as it complains [including -dev ones]. I have now hit this
checking for webkit-1.0 >= "1.2"... no
Package webkit-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you
should add the directory containing
Op maandag 3 september 2018 19:51:04 CEST schreef Paul Schwartz:
> This latest input to my thread seems to have been lost in the mail system.
> Here goes again. Most of you have the thread; this is a reply to the last
> post by Geert.
>
> I did read the guidance initially, but not thoroughly. I
Indeed, 2.6.12 is early enough that CMakeLists.txt wasn’t distributed in the
tarball though it’s available if you clone the git repository. I don’t remember
if we’d tested it enough at that point to be able to reliably build so you’re
much better off using configure.
Having gtk+-2.0 isn’t
I did read the guidance initially, but not thoroughly. I have gone back to
following the specific guidance; installed all of the required packages.
Tried the suggested cmake with a build directory not under the source
directory. Received the error message
CMake Error: The source directory
No, I meant libglib2.0-dev (I had a dash too much in my reply). And in fact
that's also what's on the wiki page Stephen pointed you at. Did you read that
page and follow the instructions ?
Regards,
Geert
Op vrijdag 31 augustus 2018 23:25:39 CEST schreef Paul Schwartz:
> apt complains that it
apt complains that it can't find libglib-2.0-dev. Did you mean
glib-2.0-dev? That was installed.
Going to try a reboot just in case.
Paul
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:11 PM Stephen M. Butler wrote:
> First -- be sure to cc the user group (gnucash-user@gnucash.org) so that
> others can jump in and
Op vrijdag 31 augustus 2018 21:01:55 CEST schreef Paul Schwartz:
> The reason for using 2.6.12 is that it generates the balance sheet
> correctly; 2.6.19 does not.
>
Ok, fair enough.
The build complains it can't find glib-2.0.pc and friends. A search on
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?
First -- be sure to cc the user group (gnucash-user@gnucash.org) so that
others can jump in and help.
Second -- I presume you have looked at this page
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/BuildUbuntu16.04
It has the entire list for building on 18.04. I know it says 16.04
but it also works for 18.04
The reason for using 2.6.12 is that it generates the balance sheet
correctly; 2.6.19 does not.
The only message generated is the long one posted above. All of my messing
with PKG_CONFIG_PATH did nothing.
Paul
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:16 PM Geert Janssens
wrote:
> Op vrijdag 31 augustus 2018
Op vrijdag 31 augustus 2018 19:36:26 CEST schreef Paul Schwartz:
> I have been trying to compile 2.6.12 on Ubuntu 18.04. I have not been able
Unless you made a typo, I suggest to try to build 2.6.21 at least. 2.6.12 is
pretty old and the 2.6 series has received quite a lot of bug fixes since.
>
On 08/31/2018 10:36 AM, Paul Schwartz wrote:
> I have been trying to compile 2.6.12 on Ubuntu 18.04. I have not been able
> to get past the recognition of glib-2.0 in configure. I have installed
> glib-2.0 and glib-2.0-dev with apt. I have tried setting PKG_CONFIG_PATH
> to /usr/share before
13 matches
Mail list logo
