The Gnucash community has had this discussion many times in the past. My
recollection is that the following terminology is accepted:
* Each line is a "split," and thus a basic transaction has two such splits.
* A transaction with more than two splits is referred to as a multi-split
transaction.
This terminology is not fully-agreed, but this is my recollection of those
previous discussions. The best alternative terminology I recall was to use the
word "entry" for what is now called a split, and reserve "split" for
transactions with more than two entries. But that terminology has never been
adopted by the community or in the documentation.
David T.
On Jan 18, 2024, 8:02 PM, at 8:02 PM, Adrien Monteleone
wrote:
>Fair enough. We need a new term for one of these things. It is a
>repeated source of confusion & consternation.
>
>Regards,
>Adrien
>
>On 1/18/24 9:54 AM, Michael or Penny Novack wrote:
>> Except I would never refer to a transaction that affect JUST TWO
>> accounts to have any "splits". When I use the term "splits" I mean
>that
>> either there is more than one debit account, more than one credit
>> account, or both. ALL transactions involve at least two accounts, at
>> least one debit and at least one credit. That is fundamental to
>double
>> entry bookkeeping.
>
>___
>gnucash-user mailing list
>gnucash-user@gnucash.org
>To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
>https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
>-
>Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
>You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
-
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
