On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 14:54 +0200, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op dinsdag 3 juli 2018 00:59:51 CEST schreef DaveC49:
> >
> > Geert,
> >
> > I had realised the same thing about needing to uninstall before
> > building and
> > shifted the section on uninstalling to before the section on
> > Building
> On Jul 5, 2018, at 12:56 AM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
> Op donderdag 5 juli 2018 07:04:21 CEST schreef David Cousens:
>> On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 14:54 +0200, Geert Janssens wrote:
>>> Are you referring to the fact that uninstall doesn't remove empty
>>> directories
>>>
>>
>> No. The
Op donderdag 5 juli 2018 07:04:21 CEST schreef David Cousens:
> On Wed, 2018-07-04 at 14:54 +0200, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > Are you referring to the fact that uninstall doesn't remove empty
> > directories
> >
>
> No. The uninstall target in build.ninja as written by cmake was just an
> empty
Op dinsdag 3 juli 2018 00:59:51 CEST schreef DaveC49:
> Geert,
>
> I had realised the same thing about needing to uninstall before building and
> shifted the section on uninstalling to before the section on Building on
> the Wiki page and specifically mentioned using the previous version's build
Geert,
I had realised the same thing about needing to uninstall before building and
shifted the section on uninstalling to before the section on Building on the
Wiki page and specifically mentioned using the previous version's build
directory. I might make the note clearer about retaining the
> On Jul 1, 2018, at 11:13 PM, DaveC49 wrote:
>
> John,
>
> Just some further information. I rebuilt GnuCash with the -G Ninja option.
>
> The build.ninja seems to contain a build uninstall target but it has no
> commands. If I run
> sudo ninja install
> it installs GnuCash (in/usr/local
John,
Just some further information. I rebuilt GnuCash with the -G Ninja option.
The build.ninja seems to contain a build uninstall target but it has no
commands. If I run
sudo ninja install
it installs GnuCash (in/usr/local the prefix I set with cmake) and creates
install_manifest.txt.
If i
John,
I'm using CMake v 3.5.1. Presumably the same or similar could be used to
create an uninstall target for Ninja. Their argument for providing a default
uninstall target seems a bit weak to me as you are not going to be issuing
the command in a build directory unless you really intend to
It was actually implemented by Rob Gowin in February last year:
https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/6b14dc5b59ee
But while thinking of this I suspect the uninstall target should equally be
run from the build directory that was used to install the old gnucash version.
If you have already
David,
That’s apparently new and undocumented behavior, maybe in CMake 3.10. Thanks
for reporting it.
Regards,
John Ralls
> On Jun 30, 2018, at 1:26 AM, DaveC49 wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> If GnuCash is not built with Ninja, there is a cmake_uninstall.cmake file in
> the top level of the build
Hi John,
If GnuCash is not built with Ninja, there is a cmake_uninstall.cmake file in
the top level of the build directory which seems to read the
install_manifest.txt file. The Makefile in the same level produced by CMake
has an uninstall target - not sure how it executes the commands in the
On 06/29/2018 12:43 AM, DaveC49 wrote:
> Stephen,
>
> It is generally a good idea to remove the previous version before installing
> a new one. Gnucash will generally overwrite any existing files of the same
> name, but you may be left with unnecessary files in some cases. Going from
> 3.1 to 3.2
Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 09:43:59 CEST schreef DaveC49:
> Stephen,
>
> It is generally a good idea to remove the previous version before installing
> a new one. Gnucash will generally overwrite any existing files of the same
> name, but you may be left with unnecessary files in some cases. Going
Stephen,
It is generally a good idea to remove the previous version before installing
a new one. Gnucash will generally overwrite any existing files of the same
name, but you may be left with unnecessary files in some cases. Going from
3.1 to 3.2 should be OK as there are unlikey to be major
On 06/29/2018 02:17 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 21:04:31 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler:
>> On 06/29/2018 11:02 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>>> Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 19:54:04 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler:
On 06/29/2018 12:42 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op maandag
Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 21:04:31 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler:
> On 06/29/2018 11:02 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 19:54:04 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler:
> >> On 06/29/2018 12:42 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> >>> Op maandag 25 juni 2018 19:42:37 CEST schreef Stephen M.
On 06/29/2018 11:02 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 19:54:04 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler:
>> On 06/29/2018 12:42 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>>> Op maandag 25 juni 2018 19:42:37 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler:
Further research:
It appears that net-charts.scm is
On 06/29/2018 12:42 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op maandag 25 juni 2018 19:42:37 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler:
>> Further research:
>>
>> It appears that net-charts.scm is a replacement for two other files in
>> standard-reports: net-linecharts.scm and net-barcharts.scm
>>
>> I renamed those
Op vrijdag 29 juni 2018 19:54:04 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler:
> On 06/29/2018 12:42 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > Op maandag 25 juni 2018 19:42:37 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler:
> >> Further research:
> >>
> >> It appears that net-charts.scm is a replacement for two other files in
> >>
> On Jun 29, 2018, at 12:42 AM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
> Op maandag 25 juni 2018 19:42:37 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler:
>> Further research:
>>
>> It appears that net-charts.scm is a replacement for two other files in
>> standard-reports: net-linecharts.scm and net-barcharts.scm
>>
>>
Op donderdag 28 juni 2018 22:11:49 CEST schreef Dennis West:
> I'm sure you like to get feedback from someone with absolutely no
> problems at all.
>
> I was using 2.6.21 on my primary computer and testing 3.1/3.2 on my
> standby testbed (both on Win 10.1803). I finally decided to take the
>
Op maandag 25 juni 2018 19:42:37 CEST schreef Stephen M. Butler:
> Further research:
>
> It appears that net-charts.scm is a replacement for two other files in
> standard-reports: net-linecharts.scm and net-barcharts.scm
>
> I renamed those two to have a .old extension on them and GnuCash now
>
I'm sure you like to get feedback from someone with absolutely no
problems at all.
I was using 2.6.21 on my primary computer and testing 3.1/3.2 on my
standby testbed (both on Win 10.1803). I finally decided to take the
plunge and upgraded my primary computer form 2.6.21 to 3.2. The
Further research:
It appears that net-charts.scm is a replacement for two other files in
standard-reports: net-linecharts.scm and net-barcharts.scm
I renamed those two to have a .old extension on them and GnuCash now
starts up without complaining about duplicate report IDs.
Stephen M Butler,
Compiled and installed on Ubuntu 18.04.
When starting up it reports several duplicate report IDs. Should I have
uninstalled 3.1 first? I did these commands (with an empty mybuild):
cd mybuild
cmake ../gnucash-3.2
make
sudo make install
Stephen M Butler, PMP, PSM
The GnuCash development team announces GnuCash 3.2, the second release of the
3.x stable release series.
Changes
Between 3.0 and 3.2, the following bugfixes were accomplished:
• Bug 787401 - Test Report System - Report Definition.
• Bug 794617 - Can't compile with
26 matches
Mail list logo
