Yeah, I wasn't thinking of this and I use it frequently.
But if you have one split *with a value*, then you'll get an
Orphan/Unbalanced split by default if you don't specify the second account.
Regards,
Adrien
On 6/9/22 8:53 AM, Stan Brown wrote:
On 2022-06-09 04:59, David Carlson wrote:
Split! Yes, but there is nothing to indicate that in the screen shot. It
may be a data entry error as Fred seems to indicate in his new thread after
this one did not solve his concern.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022, 10:15 AM john wrote:
> No, it's called a stock split. Nothing new about it at all.
>
>
No, it's called a stock split. Nothing new about it at all.
Regards,
John Ralls
> On Jun 9, 2022, at 7:46 AM, David Carlson wrote:
>
> That screen shot appears to show a security purchase without a price. Is
> this a new way to create wealth?
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022, 9:28 AM David Carlson
>
The capability for zero value transactions with a single account line was
permitted starting in release 3 point something iirc as hinted by
Christopher.
Really? Odd, then, that I can do it in 2.6.21.
Speaking as a retired senior systems analyst (and senior business
analyst) , this does NOT
That screen shot appears to show a security purchase without a price. Is
this a new way to create wealth?
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022, 9:28 AM David Carlson
wrote:
> Clearly I did not recall correctly about when this became possible.
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2022, 8:53 AM Stan Brown
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On
Clearly I did not recall correctly about when this became possible.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022, 8:53 AM Stan Brown wrote:
>
> On 2022-06-09 04:59, David Carlson wrote:
> > The capability for zero value transactions with a single account line was
> > permitted starting in release 3 point something iirc
On 2022-06-09 04:59, David Carlson wrote:
> The capability for zero value transactions with a single account line was
> permitted starting in release 3 point something iirc as hinted by
> Christopher.
>
> I complained at the time, but it technically is not unbalanced. The
> reason it is
On 09 June 2022 at 6:59, David Carlson said:
> The capability for zero value transactions with a single account line was
> permitted starting in release 3 point something iirc as hinted by
> Christopher.
Really? Odd, then, that I can do it in 2.6.21.
The capability for zero value transactions with a single account line was
permitted starting in release 3 point something iirc as hinted by
Christopher.
I complained at the time, but it technically is not unbalanced. The
reason it is allowed is that it can function as a vehicle for a comment
Screenshot?
At the least the 'other' split should be set to either the Orphan or
Unbalanced accounts.
You might need to turn on View > Transaction Journal to see it.
Regards,
Adrien
On 6/8/22 11:58 PM, Fred Tydeman wrote:
I just found a transaction that is not a double entry.
It is just a
It's possible to create a single split transaction. The only requirement is
that the transaction must be balanced i.e. the total is zero. Therefore,
create a zero-amount split and leave the "other account" field blank. If
this is not the case, then you'll have found a quantum anomaly in the
Fred,
If you go to the Accounts tab in the main window can you see either an Orphan or
Imbalance account with a non-zero balance. The transaction creation process and
the importer have never allowed you to create a transaction in GnuCash which is
unbalanced. I just tested it and tried to force
I just found a transaction that is not a double entry.
It is just a single entry. Not sure how that happened.
When I click on Split to see the other side of the entry,
there is nothing. Clicking on Jump does nothing.
With that strange transaction as the current entry:
Clicking on
13 matches
Mail list logo
