Adrian,
There’s no discount. Now or in the future. You’re going to buy items from that
merchant in the future at their then current price, not less than that price.
There’s no rebate. You aren’t paying full price and getting money back.
You handed the merchant $430.
They handed you back $500.
I'm tracking expenses so I know where my money goes, not in order to comply
with regulations. It seems like if I were tracking these expenses because
I was going to deduct them from something from business income for tax
purposes then the best approach would be to isolate the business
Michael,
I don’t regularly deal with loan entries, and each jurisdiction is different,
but in the U.S., loan forgiveness (the technical term I believe is 'discharge
of indebtedness') is often considered a source of income and is generally
taxable. That 10% annual forgiveness would likely have
Adrian,
While I am not an accountant, historically I have used a method similar to
that suggested by Adrien. However, I am intrigued by the answer provided
by Michael Novack, as it avoids the problem of overstating potentially
taxable income without needing to have a group of accounts to
I have to concur on the $70 gift idea.
You paid $430 for a stored value card that has $500 on it.
This is no different than if you handed a bank teller $430 in small bills and
they returned to you 5 one hundred dollar bills. (assuming the bank is just
fine with that)
When you spend $100 from
On 12/06/17 12:44, adrian wrote:
Tommy Trussell wrote
Adrian:
In the case at hand I spent $430 on the gift card and when I buy
something
that costs $100, I'm really only spending $86. That's what makes sense
to
me for how this ought to be counted. Since I don't know the category of
the
Tommy Trussell wrote
>> Adrian:
>> In the case at hand I spent $430 on the gift card and when I buy
>> something
>> that costs $100, I'm really only spending $86. That's what makes sense
>> to
>> me for how this ought to be counted. Since I don't know the category of
>> the expense in advance,
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:14 AM, adrian wrote:
> There may be technical accounting reasons to treat rebates as offsets to
> expenses rather than income. But my own reasons are simply that it's what
> makes sense to me. I don't really track income very carefully. I mainly
>
Adrian, is there a reason you treat the rebate as a negative expense
instead of miscellaneous (non-taxable) income? To me, the rebate is
something you get rather than something you don't give, but my analysis
could be incorrect, and if it is I'd like to know.
RBM
On 12/01/2017 06:02 AM,
I normally record rebates as offsets against the original purchase, so in your
example below I would do it as:
Asset:Bank -$1000
Expense:Electronics $1000
And then when the rebate arrives:
Expense:Electronics -$100
Asset:Bank: $100
I don’t try to record the undiscounted prices of things, since
This sounds like an overkill. I'd write the original purchase as:
Asset:Bank -$430
Asset:GiftCard: $500
Expense:Rebates -$70
Whereby Expense:Rebates generally collects anything that was purchased at a
discount, and I wish to record the original price as well as the discount.
So, a discounted
I bought a $500 gift card for $430 this week. I would like to add this to
gnucash as some kind of asset so that as I spend it, the correctly scaled
amount gets transferred to the expense account I use. In other words, if I
spend $100 from this account it's really only $86.
I tried to do this
12 matches
Mail list logo