Re: GMAE build for libgsf

2007-05-30 Thread Dominic Lachowicz
Hi, AbiWord doesn't require Bonobo, though there are various bits that it may optionally use. The case mentioned below is dead code and can be safely removed. Other places should live behind a conditional such as #ifdef HAVE_BONOBO. If they don't, that can be considered a bug and should be fixed.

Re: GMAE build for libgsf

2007-05-30 Thread Dominic Lachowicz
Unfortunately, that'd break ABI compatibility. I don't know if Jody and Morten care about that, but I do. On 5/29/07, Eduardo Lima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After thinking about the subject a little bit more, to drop bonobo support from libgsf would be too radical. So I coded a small patch to

Re: GMAE build for libgsf

2007-05-30 Thread Jody Goldberg
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:57:12PM -0300, Eduardo Lima wrote: After thinking about the subject a little bit more, to drop bonobo support from libgsf would be too radical. So I coded a small patch to make the support optional and attached it to bug #442205

Re: GMAE build for libgsf

2007-05-30 Thread Jody Goldberg
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:41:58PM -0400, Dominic Lachowicz wrote: I also wonder if it might make sense to start a libgsf backend that supports GVFS in the nearish future. It's certainly time to start looking into it, the api has stabilized somewhat (especially now that Alex is a daddy).

Re: GMAE build for libgsf

2007-05-29 Thread Jean Bréfort
Le lundi 28 mai 2007 à 23:02 -0300, Eduardo Lima a écrit : Hi list, As you all know, for the last two years I've been maintaining the port of Gnumeric and its dependencies for the Maemo[1] platform. I must say here it's being useful for many people and the users are very much satisfied with

Re: GMAE build for libgsf

2007-05-29 Thread Eduardo Lima
On 5/29/07, Jean Bréfort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we still need bonobo support on any platform? Cheers, Jean With the help of some grep commands in gnumeric and goffice code, you can see there is not a single call of gsf/bonobo related functions. -- Eduardo de Barros Lima INdT -

Re: GMAE build for libgsf

2007-05-29 Thread Ryan Pavlik
Eduardo Lima wrote: On 5/29/07, Jean Bréfort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we still need bonobo support on any platform? Cheers, Jean With the help of some grep commands in gnumeric and goffice code, you can see there is not a single call of gsf/bonobo related functions. As

Re: GMAE build for libgsf

2007-05-29 Thread Ryan Pavlik
Eduardo Lima wrote: On 5/29/07, Ryan Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As AbiWord now uses libgsf throughout but does not require GNOME, I'm guessing we don't use bonobo either, though I can't say for sure. Ryan I've also searched in Abiword code and found some uses of gsf/bonobo in trunk.

Re: GMAE build for libgsf

2007-05-29 Thread Eduardo Lima
On 5/29/07, Dominic Lachowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, that'd break ABI compatibility. I don't know if Jody and Morten care about that, but I do. Yeah, this is one of the reasons I came up with this issue here -- Counting bodies like sheep to the rhythm of the war drums.

GMAE build for libgsf

2007-05-28 Thread Eduardo Lima
Hi list, As you all know, for the last two years I've been maintaining the port of Gnumeric and its dependencies for the Maemo[1] platform. I must say here it's being useful for many people and the users are very much satisfied with it. With the recently lauched GMAE[2] initiative, we now have a