Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?

2019-02-08 Thread ng0
I agree with Martin here, I see no benefit in merging gtk in. Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 4.6K bytes: > As an example: Look at how large projects like GNOME are developed. > Nobody would even dare to put _everything_ in a single repository. That would > be preposterous. > The only project I

Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?

2019-02-08 Thread Schanzenbach, Martin
As an example: Look at how large projects like GNOME are developed. Nobody would even dare to put _everything_ in a single repository. That would be preposterous. The only project I could think of that takes such an approach is systemd. I know that you grothoff despise this project especially and

Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?

2019-02-08 Thread Schanzenbach, Martin
Yes, I do not think this is a good idea at all and is contrary to the initial motivation of this thread. We already agree the from a user perspective, the packages (.deb/.rpm et al) should ideally be split into the respective services/applications and, of course, also Gtk+. For sane dependency

Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?

2019-02-08 Thread Christian Grothoff
On 2/7/19 3:21 PM, Hartmut Goebel wrote: > Am 02.02.19 um 16:09 schrieb Christian Grothoff: >> And I wonder if it wouldn't make sense to have the gnunet.git >> configure.ac test for Gtk+ and *if* libgtk is detected, _then_ build Gtk >> GUIs that are _included_ in gnunet.git, instead of requiring