Re: [GNUnet-developers] clang formatting discussion

2019-04-17 Thread Schanzenbach, Martin
> On 17. Apr 2019, at 21:08, Christian Grothoff wrote: > > Signed PGP part > From private discussion with Martin where I pointed out a few style > issues I didn't like and Martin either created fixes or determined that > what I wanted was not (yet) possible... > (forwarding with permission)...

Re: [GNUnet-developers] clang formatting discussion

2019-04-17 Thread ng0
Christian Grothoff transcribed 5.4K bytes: > From private discussion with Martin where I pointed out a few style > issues I didn't like and Martin either created fixes or determined that > what I wanted was not (yet) possible... > (forwarding with permission)... > > On 4/17/19 3:58 PM,

[GNUnet-developers] clang formatting discussion

2019-04-17 Thread Christian Grothoff
From private discussion with Martin where I pointed out a few style issues I didn't like and Martin either created fixes or determined that what I wanted was not (yet) possible... (forwarding with permission)... On 4/17/19 3:58 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote: > The thing is clang-format is built

Re: [GNUnet-developers] [Update] Coding style clang-format

2019-04-17 Thread Schanzenbach, Martin
Hi, after playing with clang-format a bit, it seems that our current coding style is now _mostly_ compatible. There are to (minor) exceptions: 1. Always break function parameters There is not configure options to always break function parameters, e.g. f (x, y, z); Parameters are