> On 3. Mar 2022, at 01:51, madmurphy wrote:
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> As I said, it is more of a long term planning. The main argument in favor is
> that (hopefully!) the number of “gnunet-XXX” utilities is only destined to
> grow, so eventually at some point it will be needed anyway. I can
Hi Christian,
As I said, it is more of a long term planning. The main argument in favor
is that (hopefully!) the number of “gnunet-XXX” utilities is only destined
to grow, so eventually at some point it will be needed anyway. I can try to
be the devil's advocate and answer point by point…
It
Personally, I'm not a fan of this style. It just makes it less obvious
how to run the binaries under valgrind/gdb, adds just another process as
overhead, and may require re-writing documentation. It also removes the
ability to get a list of possible invocations via 'tab' easily (right
now, you can
