Marcos Marado transcribed 1.3K bytes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 10:42 AM ng0 wrote:
> >
> > > > Naturally, this is not about removing (all) credit: we would still have
> > > > both the top-level AUTHORS file and the attribution via the Git history.
> >
> > Which is in the 0.10.x series
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 10:42 AM ng0 wrote:
>
> > > Naturally, this is not about removing (all) credit: we would still have
> > > both the top-level AUTHORS file and the attribution via the Git history.
>
> Which is in the 0.10.x series timecapsule for GNUnet, and no one has
> stepped up to
ng0 transcribed 884 bytes:
> > > Naturally, this is not about removing (all) credit: we would still have
> > > both the top-level AUTHORS file and the attribution via the Git history.
>
> Which is in the 0.10.x series timecapsule for GNUnet, and no one has
> stepped up to make an major update to
> > Naturally, this is not about removing (all) credit: we would still have
> > both the top-level AUTHORS file and the attribution via the Git history.
Which is in the 0.10.x series timecapsule for GNUnet, and no one has
stepped up to make an major update to it.
It requires quiet a lot of
> On 8. Oct 2019, at 07:50, t3sserakt wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
>
>
>
> On 07.10.2019 20:29, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
>> I do not have a strong opinion either way, but I find the argument not
>> convincing.
>> I strongly believe that a part of the source/component has probably been
>>
On 07.10.2019 20:29, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> I do not have a strong opinion either way, but I find the argument not
> convincing.
> I strongly believe that a part of the source/component has probably been
> written and is maintained by a very limited number of people. Occasionally
>
I do not have a strong opinion either way, but I find the argument not
convincing.
I strongly believe that a part of the source/component has probably been
written and is maintained by a very limited number of people. Occasionally
somebody might "adopt" this but at that point this person quite
Hi all,
Sorry for cross-posting, but 'someone' just triggered me and this
applies to multiple packages, at least in theory:
On 10/7/19 7:33 PM, someone wrote (privately):
> Trying to define authors of individual source files (as opposed to
> individual commits) seems hopelessly subjective as
