Re: Orphaned secret subkeys

2008-02-21 Thread Nikola Lečić
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:11:57 +0100 Sebastien Chassot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 23:22 +0100, Nikola Lečić wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:37:10 +0100 > > N

Re: Moving from PGP to GPG

2008-02-21 Thread Maury Markowitz
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 1:53 PM, John Clizbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For the passphrase issue: the times I've seen this, it is usually due to the > passphrase having characters that don't map into the command line code-page. Wait, is there a length limit? Maury ___

re: Moving from PGP to GPG

2008-02-21 Thread vedaal
Maury Markowitz maury.markowitz at gmail.com wrote on Wed Feb 20 15:34:19 CET 2008 >gpg: Invalid passphrase; please try again ... >Uhhh, no, it's NOT invalid. And this is where I am stuck. try this: gpg -h and see if IDEA comes up on this list of algorithms installed if not, there is your answ

Still no luck on the passphrase

2008-02-21 Thread Maury Markowitz
Ok, I have done everything I can think of. I have used the original keyfiles, I've exported/imported the keyfiles, I've typed in every possible variation of the passphrase I can think of, and it still doesn't work. Is there a way to simply remove the passphrase. Yes I know this is bad, but it's be

RE: Corporate use of gnupg

2008-02-21 Thread Hardeep Singh, Noida
Hi All Isnt it pretty easy to have a script on the server (try to) decrypt each email. If the email decrypts, fine else not allow the email to go through. That will force people to retain the option in conf file if they want their message to reach. Regards Hardeep Singh http://www.SeeingWithC.o

Re: Orphaned secret subkeys

2008-02-21 Thread Sebastien Chassot
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 23:22 +0100, Nikola Lečić wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: RIPEMD160 > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:37:10 +0100 > Nikola Lečić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I wasn't aware that one had to 'save' a key immediately after deleting > > a subkey (using delkey)