On Saturday 27 February 2010, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/26/10 10:34, Martin Bretschneider wrote:
Hi,
I want to recreate my GnuPG keys. My question is if I can omit the
email address? Since I do not want my email addresses to appear on
the keyservers because of spammers and so on.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
February 27th 2010 in gnupg-users@gnupg.org thread Hot to give the
keyword from the command line
Thanks Laurent, it works :).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi John
On Saturday 27 February 2010 at 10:21:20 PM, you wrote:
MFPA wrote:
My contention is that the de
facto standard of revealing email addresses in key UIDs could actually be
mitigating *against* the use of encrypted mail, by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Charly Avital escribió:
Hi,
news of the 8.8, or 8.3 earthquake that has stricken Chile have been
posted in many on-line dailies.
...
I have also e-mailed Faramir directly, trying to have news.
Yes, we already exchanged an email yesterday.
On Feb 28, 2010, at 12:54 AM, MFPA wrote:
On Saturday 27 February 2010 at 11:19:43 PM, you wrote:
GnuPG doesn't, at least as of 1.4.10, force you to include an e-mail
address in your user ID. It merely requests an e-mail address, and you
can just press enter and ignore the request.
On Feb 27, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Grant Olson wrote:
Doh! Originally sent off list... Maybe Robert got a psychic vibe...
On 2/27/2010 2:21 PM, MFPA wrote:
I don't want such a vote. Whether somebody chooses to include an email
address in their UID is up to the individual. I have not seen
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Paul Richard Ramer wrote:
. . .
Speculation isn't any more progress than an idea is action. Speculation
buttressed with facts leads, in time, to progress. But speculation,
. . .
And speculation often has the very useful effect of stimulating
search for new facts where
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, MFPA wrote:
. . .
no way to prove you're MFPA. So I can't sign your key.
If you knew me personally, you could.
And as I already said, do you know MFPA's not my legal identity?
There used to be somebody in my town who had officially changed his
name to FREFF. (Never did
That isn't how the web of trust works. Well, it *can* work that way
for you, since you can choose who to trust and who not to, but that's
not the information encoded in there. I know dozens of people on the
net. I've exchanged encrypted mail with them, I've worked with them, in
some case
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
. . .
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
Just to note, did RJH actually intend to write
...the enemy of the good enough., which I believe is
the usual quote? The two are rather different ideas,
even more so if morality has been included as an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just wanted to share that while the OmniKey 6121 USB Reader for ID-000
cards is stated to work on the Fellowship HOW-TO page, when using the
OpenPGP v2.0 card it requires the actual OmniKey drivers to be fully
supported. I've confirmed this on both
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
It's a pretty common engineering maxim. It's not a statement about morality --
or, at least, it wasn't my intent for it to be taken as such.
For an excellent engineering example of the difference between perfect and
good, compare Project Xanadu to the
On Feb 27, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
I agree that generally speaking, it's a good idea to put keys on the
keyservers. I don't know if that makes it conventional wisdom, or who the
arbiter of such wisdom might be, but clearly a very common use of OpenPGP is
for encrypted
On Feb 28, 2010, at 4:20 PM, reynt0 wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
. . .
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
Just to note, did RJH actually intend to write
...the enemy of the good enough., which I believe is
the usual quote? The two are rather different ideas,
You can certainly tell a lot about someone by the signatures on their key.
Either directly from the signature or because those signatures point to other
keys that have their own signatures, etc. With your permission, may I see
what I can find from the signatures on your key D6B98E10?
Go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi reynt0
On Sunday 28 February 2010 at 9:18:55 PM, you wrote:
Now all the serious ones, or maybe the merely curious,
have to do is to search FREFF--or maybe buy from Google the
info Google has about FREFF if nothing can be found easily by
a
On Feb 28, 2010, at 8:09 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
You can certainly tell a lot about someone by the signatures on their key.
Either directly from the signature or because those signatures point to
other keys that have their own signatures, etc. With your permission, may I
see what I
Understood, and I agree it makes no such statement. However, it does make a
reasonably good statement that you were physically located near that person
at a certain point in time, roughly what that time was, and roughly where
(geographically) it happened.
This is assuming the signature is
David and I apparently had a bit of a misunderstanding. I thought he was going
to attempt to figure out information based solely on the key material: he was
using it as a springboard for other research. I think that both of us are
correct, given the assumptions we were making. If you have an
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 16:06 -0500, reynt0 wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Paul Richard Ramer wrote:
. . .
Speculation isn't any more progress than an idea is action. Speculation
buttressed with facts leads, in time, to progress. But speculation,
. . .
And speculation often has the very
20 matches
Mail list logo
