-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
About a week ago I updated to claws-mail-3.7.8 which broke my
pgpcore etc. plugins. Thus leaving me without a means to
decrypt all my passwords.
I upgraded to gnupg-2.0.16...would configure but not MAKE.
I then tried gnupg-2.0.15...same thi
On 1/2/2011 7:19 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 1/2/2011 7:11 PM, takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
>> When signing a public key's user ID, the statement I'm making is: "I
>> believe that this key belongs to the person described by the name and
>> the comment in the user ID."
>
> There is no fixed semant
On 1/2/2011 7:11 PM, takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
> When signing a public key's user ID, the statement I'm making is: "I
> believe that this key belongs to the person described by the name and
> the comment in the user ID."
There is no fixed semantic meaning for a signature. Each signer is
responsibl
Hi everybody,
I have a question about the meaning of signing, I'd be happy if someone checked
whether my understanding is write:
When signing a public key's user ID, the statement I'm making is: "I believe
that this key belongs to the person described by the name and the comment in
the user ID
I am out of the office until 01/03/2011.
I am out of the office until Monday January 3rd, 2011. If this is a
production problem, please call the solution center at 918-573-2336 or
email Bob Olson at robert.ol...@williams.com. I will have limited mail and
cell phone access.
Note: This is an au
On 1/2/2011 11:04 AM, takethe...@gmx.de wrote:
> And thankfully David Shaw answerd:
>
>>> By default, yes. You can override this,
>>> but it is not a good idea.
>
> Thus the answer to the question, whether one needs to check whether the key
> is self-signed is conneced with the word "override"
On Jan 2, 2011, at 2:43 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 01/02/2011 10:01 AM, David Shaw wrote:
>> The only significant use of the direct-key signature is for key owners
>> to add designated revokers to their key. Designated revokers are carried
>> in a subpacket on a direct key signature.
>
On 2011-01-02 03:14:06 PM, Neil Phillips wrote:
> i was hoping to do the following;
> locate a source file.
> place the name of the source file in a log.
> encrypt the source file name and contents
> add to the log the name of the encrypted file.
>
> that way i have a list which tells me what the
On 01/02/2011 10:01 AM, David Shaw wrote:
> The only significant use of the direct-key signature is for key owners
> to add designated revokers to their key. Designated revokers are carried
> in a subpacket on a direct key signature.
I think a revocation certificate (that is, revoking the primary
Am Sonntag 02 Januar 2011 19:36:02 schrieb takethe...@gmx.de:
> >> How is this "connection" done?
> >
> > By a self-signature. Same for the subkeys.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Could you please explain it again?
> Let's say Alice signs Bob's user ID together with Bob's public ma
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Neil Phillips wrote:
gpg should be able to give a hash, something like;
gpg -output sha1("a filename") -e filename
===
depending on your [*nix or cygwin] shell, it ~can~ do that...
gpg -o $(sha1 -qs filename) -e filename -r keyid
the exact command is system de
>> Hauke Laging thankfully answered:
>> >>[No], you always sign the key together
>> >> with a UID. gpg --list-sigs shows
>> >> this to you: The root entry is pub, the uids are the next level
>> >>("connected" to pub) and the signatures refer to UIDs.
>> How is this "connection" done?
> By a sel
Has anyone used the GnuPG smart card with a Dell Smartcard USB Keyboard?
The GnuPG doc at http://www.gnupg.org/howtos/card-howto/en/ch02s02.html just
lists the
Cherry XX44 USB keyboard.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnup
Neil Phillips gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> gpg should be able to give a hash, something like;
> gpg -output sha1("a filename") -e filename
>
or rather something like;
type sha1(filename)| gpg -o 0 -e filename
or
echo sha1(filename)| gpg -o 0 -e filename
Am Sonntag 02 Januar 2011 17:36:52 schrieb takethe...@gmx.de:
> Hauke Laging thankfully answered:
> >>[No], you always sign the key together with a UID. gpg --list-sigs shows
> >> >>this to you: The root entry is pub, the uids are the next level
> >>("connected" to pub) and the signatures refer to
On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 07:15:25 -0500
Mike Acker wrote:
> is: how does S9 equate to AES256 ? there has to be a way to find the
> equivalence between the verbose codes and the short hand
Hi Mike,
$ gpg --verbose --version
will tell you (after the cipher/algorithm and between ()) what is the
short
Atom Smasher smasher.org> writes:
> just hash the file-name.
>
> SHA1 ("secret-1.txt") = d422b71f32b06168db114638fa9778c42d7d0f3c
> SHA1 ("secret-2.txt") = d0ab019ba1975dab7c100bc5b4efa020bcd86a5d
> SHA1 ("secret-3.txt") = 753b2bd68f7ff5fc44f9142245039375a3a5b2f8
>
> use the hash as the e
On Sun, 02 Jan 2011 05:35:23 -0500
"Robert J. Hansen" wrote:
> It will respect default-cipher-preference. Certificate prefs are not
> used during symmetric encryption, since certs themselves are not used
> at all.
Indeed Robert. Thanks for pointing that out.
I only noticed that certs were not
Am Sonntag 02 Januar 2011 13:27:23 schrieb MFPA:
> 2. What statement would such a signature actually be making?
The same statement like a signature of a useless UID (without useful name and
email address) like "fubar". Leaving out a useless UID can hardly change
anything.
The formal statement i
Hi everybody,
and thanks for the answers so far!
I'm goint to write an introduction to GnuPG/PGP and therefor I'm trying to
understand some concepts.
Especially I wonder what I'll tell people about the meaning of the fingerprint.
From my point of view a fingerprint-check is useless, if the ke
Hi everybody,
In an former email (Subject: "Is self-signing necessary? Basic questions.") I
asked:
> When signing another key, what I do is to ONLY sign the other person's
> public master signing key with my own private master signing key. I don't
> sign a certain user ID or something. Is that
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011, Neil Phillips wrote:
i was hoping to do the following;
locate a source file.
place the name of the source file in a log.
encrypt the source file name and contents
add to the log the name of the encrypted file.
that way i have a list which tells me what the real name of the f
On Jan 2, 2011, at 10:06 AM, Neil Phillips wrote:
> SecureZip will take a file and encrypt both the filename and the file.
>
> so far with GnuPG i can only see how to encrypt the file.
>
> i do not want to use a specific name as there are too many files to do that.
> i want something like;
>
>
David Shaw jabberwocky.com> writes:
> Note that GPG does save the original ("mySecrets.txt" in your example)
filename inside the encrypted
> bundle. It does not, however, use it when decrypting later. See the
--use-embedded-filename option if
> you want to use that, but read the caveats in the
On Jan 2, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Neil Phillips wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm completely new to GnuPG.
> Can someone tell me how I can encrypt the name of the file that I want to
> encrypt please.
>
> Example:
> mySecrets.txt [a plain text file]
>
> I would like:
> szstt.asd [some 'apparently random name' file]
SecureZip will take a file and encrypt both the filename and the file.
so far with GnuPG i can only see how to encrypt the file.
i do not want to use a specific name as there are too many files to do that.
i want something like;
gpg -recipient "Neil Phillips" -output_encrypt "mySecrets.txt" -enc
On Jan 2, 2011, at 7:27 AM, MFPA wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi
>
>
> On Sunday 2 January 2011 at 5:05:06 AM, in
> , David Shaw
> wrote:
>
>> There is a way to sign a key alone, without signing any
>> user IDs. Nobody supports it for 3rd party signatures
>>
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Neil Phillips
> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 12:37:05 + (UTC)
> Message-id:
Neil Phillips wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm completely new to GnuPG.
> Can someone tell me how I can encrypt the name of the file that I want to
> encrypt please.
>
> Example:
> mySecrets.t
Paul Richard Ramer writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am using an OpenPGP v2 card with an SCM SPR-532 smartcard reader, and
> I can't get GPG to take a PIN from the pinpad instead of the keyboard.
> When I run "gpg --card-edit" followed by any command that requires a PIN
> or Admin PIN, I get a password dialog
Hi Neil,
* Neil Phillips [02. Jan. 2011]:
> Can someone tell me how I can encrypt the name of the file that I want to
> encrypt please.
>
> Example:
> mySecrets.txt [a plain text file]
>
> I would like:
> szstt.asd [some 'apparently random name' file] [file contents encrypted]
You may invoke gn
Many Thanks to Tiago Faria
Date:Sun, 2 Jan 2011 05:57:00 +
for excellent notes on editing GPG Keys. I had found neither GPA nor
Kleo to have all of the edit capability that should be available for a
key and in particular on the User ID and preferences for symetric ciphers
the key to this is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 2 January 2011 at 4:09:48 AM, in
, Hauke Laging
wrote:
>> Can signatures be removed from a key again?
> Yes, that is easily possible: 1) --edit-key 2) if
> needed: uid ... 3) delsig
If the key has been sent to a keyserver or to ano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Sunday 2 January 2011 at 5:05:06 AM, in
, David Shaw
wrote:
> There is a way to sign a key alone, without signing any
> user IDs. Nobody supports it for 3rd party signatures
> like these.
That brings two questions to my mind.
1. How would
Hi,
I'm completely new to GnuPG.
Can someone tell me how I can encrypt the name of the file that I want to
encrypt please.
Example:
mySecrets.txt [a plain text file]
I would like:
szstt.asd [some 'apparently random name' file] [file contents encrypted]
I see that secureZip can do this, I have us
Thanks to everyone for providing tips, I found the answer at:
"The default symmetric cipher used is CAST5"
http://www.gnupg.org/documentation/manuals/gnupg/Operational-GPG-Commands.html
and used the Ubuntu Terminal to list the ciphers used:
Home: ~/.gnupg
Supported algorithms:
Pubkey: RSA, RSA-
Hi,
I am using an OpenPGP v2 card with an SCM SPR-532 smartcard reader, and
I can't get GPG to take a PIN from the pinpad instead of the keyboard.
When I run "gpg --card-edit" followed by any command that requires a PIN
or Admin PIN, I get a password dialog box from pinentry, but I can only
enter
On 1/2/2011 12:57 AM, Tiago Faria wrote:
> If it uses GnuPG, then it will respect the rules set by your keyring
> preferences. You can check the preferences with the command:
It will respect default-cipher-preference. Certificate prefs are not
used during symmetric encryption, since certs themsel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/02/2011 12:14 AM, frankexcha...@nospammail.net wrote:
> As mentioned I am a Linux newbie (command line adverse) and like many
> users of Ubuntu they would not know how access details of what the
> default symmetric cipher is.
>
> Use of the te
On 1/2/2011 1:14 AM, frankexcha...@nospammail.net wrote:
> Use of the term "default" was provided to mean the one GPG uses without
> any user intervention IE: Default
And the answer here is exactly what I said: whatever you tell it to be.
Computers are complex beasts. Two installations of the sa
39 matches
Mail list logo
