On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 02:41, da...@systemoverlord.com said:
Other than on systems where $HOME is on a filesystem that does not
support sockets (e.g., NFS/CIFS/etc.), is anyone aware of an issue with
the use of --use-standard-socket? Seems like it would make restarting
GnuPG 2.1 will use
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 02/28/2011 06:49 PM, David Tomaschik wrote:
Each process has its own copy of the environment inherited from its
parent, so it's not possible to change the GPG_AGENT_INFO variable for
all processes. You could start gpg-agent with --use-standard-socket,
and
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:16, k...@grant-olson.net said:
If you want someone to cleanup and update the howto, I volunteer. I
just need to know the name of the cvs project. 'card-howto' didn't seem
to work.
It is the module card-howto in the gpgweb repository. However, I
recently started to
I believe that within the next five years someone will discover an academic
attack against Rijndael. I do not believe that anyone will ever discover an
attack that will allow someone to read Rijndael traffic. So while I have
serious academic reservations about Rijndael, I do not have any
Hi,
I´m trying to move a private Key (RSA, PEM format) made by a Microsoft CA to
the GPF Crypto Stick.
gpgsm tells me while importing:
pgsm: no issuer found in certificate
gpgsm: basic certificate checks failed - not imported
ERROR: object length field 1 octects too large
ERROR: object
Not GPG specific, but I was wondering if someone could point me in the
direction of some resources that explain why we use different keys to
sign and encrypt (for cases where the same key _could_ do both e.g.
RSA). I cant seem to pick anything up on google.
Thanks
--
Guy Halford-Thompson -
Op 28-2-2011 23:23, Robert J. Hansen schreef:
He then learned that his users thought the banner across the top was
just another one of those annoying Flash ads, and they tuned it out.
Their senses were dulled by overadvertising. He had better also
distributed Adblock Plus to try to counter the
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 09:40:07PM -0500 Also sprach David Tomaschik:
I've recently received my smart card, but was wondering what the best
practices are, mainly from a physical standpoint. When I use it in
my laptop reader, it sticks about 2 out of the side, and I have some
concern about this
Hello!
We are pleased to announce version 1.2.0 of Libksba.
Libksba is an X.509 and CMS (PKCS#7) library. It is for example
required to build the S/MIME part of GnuPG-2 (gpgsm). The only build
requirement for Libksba itself is the libgpg-error package. There are
no other dependencies; actual
Hi,
I am planning to use gnuPG (v1.4.10) binary in netbsd 5 for encryption. The
key generation is supported as interactive session, but I want to use non
interactive session. I could not find any binary with non interactive session.
Does anyone know where to get such a binary??
Regards,
On Mar 1, 2011, at 8:13 AM, Guy Halford-Thompson wrote:
Not GPG specific, but I was wondering if someone could point me in the
direction of some resources that explain why we use different keys to
sign and encrypt (for cases where the same key _could_ do both e.g.
RSA). I cant seem to pick
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:13:16PM + Also sprach Guy Halford-Thompson:
Not GPG specific, but I was wondering if someone could point me in the
direction of some resources that explain why we use different keys to
sign and encrypt (for cases where the same key _could_ do both e.g.
RSA).
On Mar 1, 2011, at 7:39 AM, ravi shankar wrote:
Hi,
I am planning to use gnuPG (v1.4.10) binary in netbsd 5 for encryption.
The key generation is supported as interactive session, but I want to use non
interactive session. I could not find any binary with non interactive
session.
Thanks for the list of resources
G
On 1 March 2011 14:41, Jeffrey Walton noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Guy Halford-Thompson g...@cach.me wrote:
Not GPG specific, but I was wondering if someone could point me in the
direction of some resources that explain why we
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 9:34 AM, lists.gn...@mephisto.fastmail.net wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 01:13:16PM + Also sprach Guy Halford-Thompson:
Not GPG specific, but I was wondering if someone could point me in the
direction of some resources that explain why we use different keys to
On Tuesday 01 March 2011, David Shaw wrote:
On Feb 28, 2011, at 7:09 PM, David Tomaschik wrote:
I think key UIDs generally reveal more information than I am
comfortable with. For example, why does your UID need to contain
your email address in plain text rather than as a hash? Searching
On Sunday 27 February 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/27/2011 02:04, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
On Saturday, February 26, 2011, MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Friday 25 February 2011 at 1:45:03 AM, in
mid:87lj14x4yo@servo.finestructure.net, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
Yikes! I thought we were
Hi,
I have CentOS 5.5 with gnupg 1.4.5.
I am using the following command to generate the keys:
echo LinuxMasters | /usr/bin/gpg --homedir /home/USER/.gnupg -e -a -r
em...@domain.com /somefile
The problem I am facing is that until today all the keys generated
using this command had the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Tuesday 1 March 2011 at 8:56:56 PM, in
mid:201103012156.57...@thufir.ingo-kloecker.de, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Hmm. Why do the keyservers need to support it at all?
IMO the clients that want to upload a key should check
for this flag and
On Mar 1, 2011, at 6:29 PM, MFPA wrote:
On Tuesday 1 March 2011 at 8:56:56 PM, in
mid:201103012156.57...@thufir.ingo-kloecker.de, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
Hmm. Why do the keyservers need to support it at all?
IMO the clients that want to upload a key should check
for this flag and warn the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Tuesday 1 March 2011 at 1:54:25 AM, in
mid:4d6c51d1.6030...@fifthhorseman.net, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
However, i'm quite serious about the flaws paralleling
the failures of NSEC3 to prevent DNS zone enumeration.
the problem space is
On 03/01/2011 08:05 PM, MFPA wrote:
My analogy, admittedly not a direct comparison, would be having a
phone number that is ex-directory. It is no defence against random
dialling, nor against your number being recorded from outgoing calls
if you don't take steps such as withholding the CLI, nor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Wednesday 2 March 2011 at 1:43:45 AM, in
mid:4d6da0d1.20...@fifthhorseman.net, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 03/01/2011 08:05 PM, MFPA wrote:
My analogy, admittedly not a direct comparison, would be having a
phone number that is
The benefits of your phone number being ex-directory are the benefits
that derive from it being harder for people to obtain your phone
number without your permission, harder to link the number to your
name/address, and impossible to find your address or phone number by
looking in the phone
24 matches
Mail list logo
