Op 15-3-2011 21:16, Robert J. Hansen schreef:
This may not be so much an argument for IDEA's inclusion as it might be
an argument for data migration.
How do I re-sign a message with someone else's private key? And for that
matter, how do I do that convenient with a mailbox with many encrypted
Op 15-3-2011 21:32, Ben McGinnes schreef:
That's probably a worthwhile discussion to have. Even if RFC1991
support is maintained, there's still value in migrating encrypted data
to more robust algorithms.
Only if IDEA gets broken (or the pgp 2.x implementation of it turns out
flawed) or,
Op 15-3-2011 21:57, Ingo Klöcker schreef:
Why migrate away? Even if GnuPG 3 stops supporting RFC1991 there will
always be GnuPG 1 and GnuPG 2 around to decrypt ancient data and verify
signatures made decades ago.
If that is the case, you could also say we still have pgp 2.x arround
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:33, b...@adversary.org said:
Okay, so that would cover 3DES too? Surely there can't be many
No. DES and thus 3DES have a blocksize of 64 bit. The blocksize is not
related to the keysize.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein
On 16/03/11 8:50 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 06:33, b...@adversary.org said:
Okay, so that would cover 3DES too? Surely there can't be many
No. DES and thus 3DES have a blocksize of 64 bit. The blocksize is not
related to the keysize.
Ah, right, got it. Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:15:45AM +0100, Johan Wevers wrote:
Op 15-3-2011 21:32, Ben McGinnes schreef:
That's probably a worthwhile discussion to have. Even if RFC1991
support is maintained, there's still value in migrating encrypted data
to more robust algorithms.
Only if IDEA gets
Op 16-3-2011 13:53, Mark H. Wood schreef:
Only if IDEA gets broken (or the pgp 2.x implementation of it turns out
flawed) or, very unlikely, 128 bit can be brute-forced in the future.
On that day it would be well to already know what to do about it and
already have the tools in hand. It
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on
Wed Mar 16 00:42:48 CET 2011 :
GnuPG does the MDC by default whenever all the keys can handle it
What kind of key can't handle it in gnupg?
I sent messages to all key types, including v3 keys, using the
forced MDC,
(my preferred cipher is 3DES,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:41 AM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on
Wed Mar 16 00:42:48 CET 2011 :
GnuPG does the MDC by default whenever all the keys can handle it
What kind of key can't handle it in gnupg?
I sent messages to all key types, including
On 3/16/2011 10:05 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
2 key or 3 key? 2TDEA only provides about 80 bits of security, and is
usually not recommend for use.
The OpenPGP spec requires three-key 3DES, and GnuPG conforms to the spec.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
On Mar 16, 2011, at 9:41 AM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on
Wed Mar 16 00:42:48 CET 2011 :
GnuPG does the MDC by default whenever all the keys can handle it
What kind of key can't handle it in gnupg?
None. It's not a key type, but a
On Mar 16, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 9:41 AM, ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on
Wed Mar 16 00:42:48 CET 2011 :
GnuPG does the MDC by default whenever all the keys can handle it
What kind of key can't handle
Johan Wevers johanw at vulcan.xs4all.nl wrote on
Wed Mar 16 09:16:56 CET 2011 :
Current OSes pose already a problem. PGP 2 did not provide nagtive
binaries for win32 so I compiled them myself
I've had a problem running Disastry's PGP 2.6.3 multi6 on 64 bit
windows systems, because the DOS
Hello,
currently I have some trouble to get my Cyberjack running with PCSC. So I
wonder, can GnuPG (2.0.16) also work with CTAPI drivers?
Thanx
Malte
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Is PGP/ENIGMAIL compatible with folks using Outlook or Microsoft Mail
with PGP Desktop?
I've tried searching for this but no luck,-- :-(
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 3/16/2011 7:01 PM, Mike Acker wrote:
Is PGP/ENIGMAIL compatible with folks using Outlook or Microsoft
Mail with PGP Desktop?
PGP is a registered trademark of the PGP Corporation. It's a great
product, but Enigmail doesn't use it. Enigmail uses GnuPG, which is a
compatible implementation of
Mike Acker wrote:
Is PGP/ENIGMAIL compatible with folks using Outlook or Microsoft Mail
with PGP Desktop?
I've tried searching for this but no luck,-- :-(
Enigmail is an extension for Thunderbird and Mozilla mail. It uses GnuPG for its
cryptographic processing. It conforms to RFC2 4880 and
17 matches
Mail list logo
