On 8/23/11 9:14 PM, David Tomaschik wrote:
> I don't see a windows binary, but it looks to be written in pure C with
> no external dependencies, so I would assume you could easily build it
> under Cygwin.
Cygwin isn't necessary: it compiles just fine under plain MinGW. I've
got a native Win32 ver
On 08/23/2011 06:52 PM, Faramir wrote:
> El 03-08-2011 9:40, ved...@nym.hush.com escribió:
> > Sorry, wrong link extension,
>
> > here is the correct one: http://www.pgpdump.net/
>
> By the way, what would be required to run pgpdump locally? I guess
> there is no compiled version for windows...
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
El 03-08-2011 9:40, ved...@nym.hush.com escribió:
> Sorry, wrong link extension,
>
> here is the correct one: http://www.pgpdump.net/
By the way, what would be required to run pgpdump locally? I guess
there is no compiled version for windows...
On Thursday 18 August 2011, Alex (via GPGTools) wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On 18.08.2011, at 20:39, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > why should it support something strange like a
> > multipart/alternative message with a text/plain part and a
> > PGP/MIME part.
>
> isn't this what the message "This is an Op
On 8/23/11 12:43 PM, David Tomaschik wrote:
>
> So even a 4-digit PIN would ensure a less than 1% chance of guessing
> the PIN. (Assuming that the user does not select obvious pins like
> birthdates, anniversaries, etc.) At 8 digits, the probability becomes
> something like 6*10^-8, if I do the
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:12, da...@systemoverlord.com said:
>> Would it be reasonable to say that you may use a significantly smaller
>> PIN for your smartcard than would be required of a passphrase, since
>> the smartcard locks itself after 3 tr
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:51, michaelquig...@theway.org said:
>> gpg --batch --armor -keyring /Publib/.../ARP_pubring.gpg
This is the same as -k -e -y -r -i -n -g - thus you are asking for a key
lising and encryption ... - Use two dashes.
Back to the fingerprint p
On Tue Aug 23, 2011 at 09:51:59 -0400, michaelquig...@theway.org wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I use this syntax to sign files in a script--it works without problems,
> but when trying to manually sign a file, I'm receiving the following
> result:
>
> > gpg --batch --armor -keyring /Publib/.../ARP_pubrin
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:15:27AM -0400, michaelquig...@theway.org wrote:
gpg: conflicting commands
$
I'm sure I'm overlooking something simple, but I'm just not seeing it
today.
Okay -- I found the dash in "clear-sign"--which should read "clearsign".
Of course I find it shortly after
Michael Quigley/TheWay wrote on 08/23/2011 09:51:59 AM:
> Hello,
>
> I use this syntax to sign files in a script--it works without
> problems, but when trying to manually sign a file, I'm receiving the
> following result:
>
> > gpg --batch --armor -keyring /Publib/.../ARP_pubring.gpg --secret-
Hello,
I use this syntax to sign files in a script--it works without problems,
but when trying to manually sign a file, I'm receiving the following
result:
> gpg --batch --armor -keyring /Publib/.../ARP_pubring.gpg
--secret-keyring /Prodlib/.../ARP_secring.gpg --local-user 55EC3D41\!
--output
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:12, da...@systemoverlord.com said:
> Would it be reasonable to say that you may use a significantly smaller
> PIN for your smartcard than would be required of a passphrase, since
> the smartcard locks itself after 3 tries?
Yes. It is up to 6 tries because an attacker may al
Would it be reasonable to say that you may use a significantly smaller
PIN for your smartcard than would be required of a passphrase, since
the smartcard locks itself after 3 tries?
Since I don't use a reader with a pinpad, I must type my PIN in, and
thus have about 8 alpha-numeric characters for
Hi!
Am 20:59, schrieb Anthony Papillion:
> My passphrases are
> stored in a Keepass database that resides in a TrueCrypt container. It's
> protected well. My actual key is protected by a 62 character passphrase
One could argue that this is equivalent to having a passphrase-less
keyring within the
I have 64-bit Windows 7. But there may be a hope. Microsoft has an
emulator/virtual machine called Windows XP Mode THAT runs many older Windows
XP programs and that are "not natively compatible with Windows 7". Do you
know if Gpg4win will install GpgEX running in Windows XP Mode?
Werner Koch wr
On 08/23/2011 02:44, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:09, do...@dougbarton.us said:
>
>> Awesome, thanks! The problem turned out to be the fingerprint option in
>
> Right, fingerprint is a command and may thus not be combined with other
> commands.
Well sure, it makes sense when you
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:09, do...@dougbarton.us said:
> Awesome, thanks! The problem turned out to be the fingerprint option in
Right, fingerprint is a command and may thus not be combined with other
commands.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesges
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:02:30 +0200
Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:06, do...@dougbarton.us said:
>
> > Any suggestions on how I can debug why gpgme is not recognizing that
> > there is a signature in the message?
>
> That is not enough information to help you.
>
> To look at what g
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:06, do...@dougbarton.us said:
> Any suggestions on how I can debug why gpgme is not recognizing that
> there is a signature in the message?
That is not enough information to help you.
To look at what gpgme is doing you may set an envvar before starting
claws like here:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:39, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
> For some certificates gpgsm asks during import, whether to trust them
> (and if confirmed, add entry to trustlist.txt automatically). Is it
> possible to make gpgsm to ask whether to trust it, for any certificate?
It does that for all proper certi
On 2011.08.23. 10:07, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:05, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
>
>> So, order of certificate hashes, relative of certificate order in
>> keyring, is critically important?
> No. You need to make sure to not use lines of more than ~255
> characters. Check that your edito
On 08/23/2011 02:04 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:47, papill...@gmail.com said:
>
> Spying on X windows is pretty easy and thus Pinentry tries to make it
> harder.
Werner,
Since I've never used Pinentry, I'm obviously missing something here.
While I'm aware that spying on X-Win
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:44, mike_ac...@charter.net said:
> result of a search... it would need to first search for the key by
> whatever search text was provided, and then search for hits on the
> fingerprint... if there is a revoke cert then you want to return that.
Keyservers store one copy of a
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:05, y...@yyy.id.lv said:
> So, order of certificate hashes, relative of certificate order in
> keyring, is critically important?
No. You need to make sure to not use lines of more than ~255
characters. Check that your editor didn't reflow a comment block or
similar.
Sal
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:47, papill...@gmail.com said:
> stored in a Keepass database that resides in a TrueCrypt container. It's
> protected well. My actual key is protected by a 62 character passphrase
... as long as the box is pwoered down. Hard disk encryption does not
help if the box is up an
25 matches
Mail list logo