Am Do 07.02.2013, 10:28:29 schrieb Kamalakannan N:
> Application is run by the same user and secret key is protected by a
> passphrase.
Take the passphrase off the key and check whether the batch file works then.
> Actually we are using the batch file to decrypt the file and we calling the
ba
On 2/6/13 4:28 AM, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> Can you explain (broadly) how one would compromise the signature/the device
> that
> you sign with?
Happily!
I have an OpenPGP smartcard and an SCM card reader. I installed it
under Fedora 16 and it worked beautifully. Under Fedora 17 it's broken.
Aft
Hi Hauke Laging ,
Kindly look into the below command and result .
Help me out to resolve the NO SECRET KEY issue.
E:\>gpg --list-keys
C:/Documents and Settings/dstage/Application Data/gnupg/pubring.gpg
---
pub 2048R/D36AB872 2
Hello Hauke Laging ,
Really thanks for the mail , but still am facing the same issue .
when i try to import my public and private key once again through Command
prompt ,CMD say's that my keys are already in keyring .
I have one query on Key IDs,
while am importing massage show that Key ID file
On Wednesday 06 of February 2013 11:57:40 ved...@nym.hush.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 at 5:42 AM, "Hauke Laging"
wrote:
> >The problem is not to forge a signature but the difficulty to
> >force that only data with checked integrity gets signed. How are you going
> >to do that with
On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 at 5:42 AM, "Hauke Laging"
wrote:
>The problem is not to forge a signature but the difficulty to
>force that only data with checked integrity gets signed. How are you going to
>do
>that with a PDF?
There is a bigger problem with a pdf, that if, once a hash al
On 06/02/13 11:37, Hauke Laging wrote:
> Then you can (safely...) copy the data to several PCs and have them show you
> both the file hash and the document (in that order). Hoping that at least one
> of the PCs is not compromised.
In my other mail I got kinda hung up on manual verification but for
On 06/02/13 11:37, Hauke Laging wrote:
> That seems easy to me: Except for small amounts (secure device's display
> capacity) of very simple data (plain text) [...]
Seems to me to be enough to do what OP requested: signing e-mails he/she wrote.
It indeed seems easy to me that this won't work for
Am Mi 06.02.2013, 13:10:32 schrieb Kamalakannan N:
> Really thanks for the mail , but still am facing the same issue .
>
> when i try to import my public and private key once again through Command
prompt ,CMD say's that my keys are already in keyring .
>
> I have one query on Key IDs,
> while am
Am Mi 06.02.2013, 10:28:13 schrieb Peter Lebbing:
> Can you explain (broadly) how one would compromise the signature/the device
> that you sign with?
That seems easy to me: Except for small amounts (secure device's display
capacity) of very simple data (plain text) you have the problem that the P
On 06/02/13 02:49, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> It makes no sense to me to believe that it's somehow possible to have a
> dongle that you can plug into a compromised PC to make it safe (or
> safer) to sign with.
Can you explain (broadly) how one would compromise the signature/the device that
you sign
11 matches
Mail list logo
