On 08/25/2013 04:04 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> On 8/24/2013 5:14 PM, Jan wrote:
SNIP
>> It seems quite easy to advice people to have an offline windows PC
>> with gpg4win on it and all their private stuff and a windows(?)
>> online PC next to it. They could transfer encrypted messages with an
On 8/24/2013 5:14 PM, Jan wrote:
> We will not be able to change the fact, that most people use an
> insecure Windows or Mac OS, neither.
In a lot of ways, Windows 7 and beyond are much harder targets to crack
than Linux is -- Microsoft's implementation of ASLR is much stronger
than Linux's, for i
Thanks to everyone for the vivid discussion.
@HHH: Thanks for your text at
http://www.securemecca.com/public/GnuPG/TrustOfGPG4Win-2.txt
As my little discourse here should have shown to you,
Windows users as a group by and large just don't care about
securing their systems. They want a one stop