Hi,
On Saturday 15 November 2014 11:52:02 da...@gbenet.com wrote:
Laptop-1 and laptop-2 are a mirror image of each. They contain the same
software. I copied programmes like Thunderbird Firefox from laptop-1 to
laptop-2 without any problems.
It seems like the mirroring of laptop-1 to laptop-2
On 15/11/14 12:36, Johannes Zarl wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 15 November 2014 11:52:02 da...@gbenet.com wrote:
Laptop-1 and laptop-2 are a mirror image of each. They contain the same
software. I copied programmes like Thunderbird Firefox from laptop-1 to
laptop-2 without any problems.
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 13 November 2014 at 10:33:31 PM, in
mid:546531bb.2000...@gbenet.com, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
I exported my keys to a USB stick. Then I copied my
.gnupg to a new Linux laptop. Then I imported my keys.
I thought that I would be
On 15/11/14 15:17, MFPA wrote:
Hi
On Thursday 13 November 2014 at 10:33:31 PM, in
mid:546531bb.2000...@gbenet.com, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
I exported my keys to a USB stick. Then I copied my
.gnupg to a new Linux laptop. Then I imported my keys.
I thought that I would be fine.
But
GPG generated a key and copied to /.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
but how do I show generated keys to other people?
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 15/11/14 03:42, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Heinz Diehl wrote:
||__|| | Please don't |
/ O O\__ feed |
/ \ the troll |
Best forcibly un-subscribe da...@gbenet.com.
Cheers,
On Saturday, 2014-11-15 23:22:58 Clarence wrote:
GPG generated a key and copied to /.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
but how do I show generated keys to other people?
From the terminal you can run:
$gpg -K --fingerprint
For me this shows:
/home/snassar/.gnupg/secring.gpg
GnuPG shows public keys in that way?
Samir Nassar sa...@samirnassar.com wrote:
On Saturday, 2014-11-15 23:22:58 Clarence wrote:
GPG generated a key and copied to /.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
but how do I show generated keys to other people?
From the terminal you can run:
$gpg
On 15/11/14 17:00, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
On 15.11.14 12:52, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
The steps I have taken to move my /.gnupg folder
Background:
I have two laptops (1) a 32 bit LXD laptop-1 (2) a 64 bit LXD
laptop-2 one mouse and one WD 1.0 TB (1,000,202,043,392 bytes)
external drive
On 15/11/14 17:16, Paul R. Ramer wrote:
On November 15, 2014 3:52:02 AM PST, da...@gbenet.com da...@gbenet.com
wrote:
[snip]
david@laptop-1:/media/david/store$ gpg -ao --import
--allow-non-selfsigned-uid david-public.key
gpg: armour header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
pub
On Sunday, 2014-11-16 01:12:24 tfmnk wrote:
GnuPG shows public keys in that way?
Bah. My mistake. I read public key, but acted for fingerprint.
You can choose to use an ID, the fingerprint, or a key ID. For reference
though, use the fine GnuPG manual entry here:
Hi All,
The problem is with gpg2 on a 64 bit O/S I removed gpg2 and also lost GPA and
Kleopatra and
Kgpg no longer runs on my 64 bit Linux.
Now my only error is bad passphrase. Which I can not change from the terminal.
Also as I recall the problem is with Enigmail - I have to install a version
On 15.11.14 12:52, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
The steps I have taken to move my /.gnupg folder
Background:
I have two laptops (1) a 32 bit LXD laptop-1 (2) a 64 bit LXD
laptop-2 one mouse and one WD 1.0 TB (1,000,202,043,392 bytes)
external drive that plugs into the USB port of either
On Saturday, 2014-11-15 17:53:57 da...@gbenet.com wrote:
A rule maybe - don't run gpg2 on a 64 bit Linux system - and install a much
older version of Thunderbird and enigmail - and never upgrade Thunderbird
to a newer version.
For those of you who come to David's post in the future through the
On 15-11-2014 18:16, da...@gbenet.com wrote:
I did that. But now I have half resolved the issue. The error only appears on
a 64 bit gpg2
system
I believe there exist some differences between gpg2 keyrings and gpg 1.x
keyrings, but I don't know the details. Does gpg2 still use trustdb.gpg?
On November 15, 2014 3:52:02 AM PST, da...@gbenet.com da...@gbenet.com
wrote:
[snip]
david@laptop-1:/media/david/store$ gpg -ao --import
--allow-non-selfsigned-uid david-public.key
gpg: armour header: Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
pub 4096R/AAD8C47D 2014-08-17 postmaster (There's always
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
I just got the following error messages from Gnupg 2.1 and Windows
XP:-
gpg: O j: ... this is a bug (/home/wk/b-w32/speedo/gnupg-
2.1.0/g10/import.c:1278:transfer_secret_keys)
This application has requested the Runtime to
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:02, sa...@samirnassar.com said:
For those of you who come to David's post in the future through the mailing
list archive: Disregard this misconception. Many of us, myself included, use
gpg2 on a 64bit system without a problem.
Actually I do the development on 64 bit
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:10, joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl said:
I believe there exist some differences between gpg2 keyrings and gpg 1.x
keyrings, but I don't know the details. Does gpg2 still use trustdb.gpg?
No. Only with 2.1 tehre is the new keybox format (pubring.kbx) which
will be used for new
I remember something like this happening with shorewall or smoothwall
or something where this guy tried to get ownership of the opensource
so then everybody jumped ship and made ipcop. Some guy came on the new
mailing list and you would swear he was a wind-up, knew enough to keep
you on your toes
Over the last few days there's been a lot of angry and hurtful words
thrown about surrounding the subject of trying to migrate a GnuPG 2.0
keyring. I'm not going to weigh in on who's got the right of things or
who's being unreasonable. I think we've all had the experience of being
deeply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 14 November 2014 at 3:01:59 PM, in
mid:54661967.30...@nordnet.fr, Philip Jackson wrote:
Does
he have to pause between each iteration to see if he
has 'something good' ?
Could, presumably, stop after several iterations to check
On 15/11/14 20:24, Werner Koch wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:10, joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl said:
I believe there exist some differences between gpg2 keyrings and gpg 1.x
keyrings, but I don't know the details. Does gpg2 still use trustdb.gpg?
No. Only with 2.1 tehre is the new keybox format
23 matches
Mail list logo
