Hi!
I introduced a regression in 2.1.2 which may lead to a non working
pinpad reader. If you experience problems, please try the attached
patch.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
From 07a71da479daaac43b8c5b1034a1e66f96bdbc48 Mon Sep 17
On 12/04/2014 01:23 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:35, m...@monaco.cx said:
Does anyone have gpg-agent forwarding working with SSH's recent generic
socket
forwarding? Does it still require socat on one end, because I've only been
able
to specify a socket path on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/15 20:40, Werner Koch wrote:
Since the start of the funding campaign in December several thousand people
have been kind enough to donate a total of 25 Euro to support this
project. In addition the Linux Foundation gave a grant of $
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:31, patr...@enigmail.net said:
The usual installer for Mac OS X is now available from
https://sourceforge.net/p/gpgosx/docu/Download/
I just added the URL to the download page.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
in my quest of the perfect setup, I am asking myself what is the
prefered way to sign a message: inline (like this one) or using a MIME header ?
Is there a big thumb rule to respect ?
Regards
- --
Sent with my mu4e
-BEGIN PGP
Hello,
Let me record a bit of history.
On 02/13/2015 01:19 AM, Brian Minton wrote:
I recently got a new Nexus 5, with NFC. Supposedly it supports ISO
7816-4. Is there any possibility of, for instance, porting gnuk to
android? I'd love to use my smartphone as a smartcard. Of course, the
On Thu 2015-02-12 18:14:14 -0500, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
in my quest of the perfect setup, I am asking myself what is the
prefered way to sign a message: inline (like this one) or using a
MIME header ?
Is there a big thumb rule to respect ?
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:46:33 +0100, Xavier Maillard stated:
Hello,
in my quest of the perfect setup, I am asking myself what is the
prefered way to sign a message: inline (like this one) or using a MIME
header ?
Is there a big thumb rule to respect ?
Inline totally destroys a sig
Hi, Philip,
Am 11.02.2015 um 22:35 schrieb Philip Jackson:
On 11/02/15 21:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Wed 2015-02-11 14:02:49 -0500, Philip Jackson wrote:
On 11/02/15 14:59, Brian Minton wrote:
[snip]
When I try your way from the command line, I get :
$ apt-cache policy gnupg2
Hi Stephan,
On 12/02/15 22:46, Stephan Beck wrote:
Hi, Philip,
Am 11.02.2015 um 22:35 schrieb Philip Jackson:
On 11/02/15 21:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Wed 2015-02-11 14:02:49 -0500, Philip Jackson wrote:
On 11/02/15 14:59, Brian Minton wrote:
[snip]
In synaptic: have you set
in my quest of the perfect setup, I am asking myself what is the
prefered way to sign a message: inline (like this one) or using a
MIME header ?
Is there a big thumb rule to respect ?
https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#use_pgpmime
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic
Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org writes:
in my quest of the perfect setup, I am asking myself what is the
prefered way to sign a message: inline (like this one) or using a
MIME header ?
Is there a big thumb rule to respect ?
https://www.gnupg.org/faq/gnupg-faq.html#use_pgpmime
THank
Jerry je...@seibercom.net writes:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:46:33 +0100, Xavier Maillard stated:
Hello,
in my quest of the perfect setup, I am asking myself what is the
prefered way to sign a message: inline (like this one) or using a MIME
header ?
Is there a big thumb rule to respect ?
I don't know if this is true for PGP-Basics, but it is certainly not
true for enigmail or gnupg-users. Please update the FAQ!
It's still true for PGP-Basics; Enigmail's been bit by it within the
last year, if memory serves, but it's been generally accepted; GnuPG's
been AFAIK stable for it.
Zitat von Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
in my quest of the perfect setup, I am asking myself what is the
prefered way to sign a message: inline (like this one) or using a
MIME header ?
Is there a big thumb rule to respect ?
FWIW, Mac Mail marked this message as spam. Not sure if it universally does
that for all inline sigs, but ... FYI.
Chris
On 12 Feb 2015, at 23:46, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
in my quest of the perfect setup, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Maybe I cannot offer a big rule for THE preferred way. Jerry is
right, but maybe we HAVE to deal with recipients who have no
influence to take a mail client which is capable to handle PGP/MIME
sigbatures properly. Then it is also MY problem.
I
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:25, 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net said:
If GnuPG 2.1.x finds an existing secring.gpg, that is used. If not,
the new file format secring.kbx is used.
Nope. You will never find a secring.kbc. 2.1 uses secring.gpg only in
this ways:
If secring.gpg exists and
On 12/02/15 13:10, Peter Lebbing wrote:
On 11/02/15 20:40, Werner Koch wrote:
Since the start of the funding campaign in December several thousand people
have been kind enough to donate a total of 25 Euro to support this
project. In addition the Linux Foundation gave a grant of $ 6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I recently got a new Nexus 5, with NFC. Supposedly it supports ISO
7816-4. Is there any possibility of, for instance, porting gnuk to
android? I'd love to use my smartphone as a smartcard. Of course, the
smartphone wouldn't have as many
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11.02.15 20:40, Werner Koch wrote:
Hello!
The GnuPG Project is pleased to announce the availability of the
third release of GnuPG modern: Version 2.1.2.
The usual installer for Mac OS X is now available from
21 matches
Mail list logo
