Re: gnupg migration corrupt db?

On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 13:37 +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > > > gpg: keydb_get_keyblock failed: Value not found > > gpg: key 77731557: public key "[User ID not found]" imported > > gpg: key 77731557: failed to re-lookup public key > > Please update to 2.1.4 2.1.2 has some problems skipping PGP-2 key

Re: Removing hkp from server

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Camatek Electronics Support Staff: > Made the mistake of having no revocation certs and ended up with a > mess. Lots of duplicates on hkp.gnupg.net. > > > > Is there an administrative contact to have them removed? > It would depend on the keyse

Re: Removing hkp from server

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Friday 15 May 2015 at 4:48:52 PM, in , Camatek Electronics Support Staff wrote: > Is there an administrative contact to have them > removed? No. If a server administrator deleted keys from one server, they would soon be propagated back from o

Re: gnupg migration corrupt db?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Friday 15 May 2015 at 12:57:35 PM, in , Berend De Schouwer wrote: > How do I check if they are PGP2 keys? If they are, they will have a shorter fingerprint which is commonly presented as 16 separate double hex digits.

Re: Removing hkp from server

> Made the mistake of having no revocation certs and ended up with a mess. > Lots of duplicates on hkp.gnupg.net. > > Is there an administrative contact to have them removed? Once uploaded to a keyserver, a certificate can't be removed. Once it's there, it's there for good.

Re: Removing hkp from server

On Fri 2015-05-15 11:48:52 -0400, Camatek Electronics Support Staff wrote: > Made the mistake of having no revocation certs and ended up with a mess. > Lots of duplicates on hkp.gnupg.net. > > Is there an administrative contact to have them removed? Sorry, you probably can't get them removed. I

Re: Removing hkp from server

On 15/05/15 17:48, Camatek Electronics Support Staff wrote: > Is there an administrative contact to have them removed? No, that is not possible. Do you still have the private key? Because as long as you still have the private key, you can still generate a revocation certificate and upload it. That

Removing hkp from server

Made the mistake of having no revocation certs and ended up with a mess. Lots of duplicates on hkp.gnupg.net. Is there an administrative contact to have them removed? Mark Rybicki CAMATEK Electronics Inc 480 W Mitchell St Ste 1W Petoskey, MI 49770 P: 231-347-7530 P: 231-547-

Re: What Linux kernel configuration options are required by GPG for --refresh-keys?

I verified this to be the case in Wireshark. It's sending both A and queries for hostname vod.ohai.su (not sure how it got that from pool.sks-keyservers.net but whatever probably not relevant.) However it's only GPG that seems to do this. If I ping either of those hostnames it sends only an

Re: What Linux kernel configuration options are required by GPG for --refresh-keys?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/15/2015 04:20 PM, Daniel Bomar wrote: > I verified this to be the case in Wireshark. It's sending both A > and queries for hostname vod.ohai.su (not sure how it got that > from pool.sks-keyservers.net but whatever probably not relevant.)

Re: What Linux kernel configuration options are required by GPG for --refresh-keys?

Hello, Am 15.05.2015 um 16:20 schrieb Daniel Bomar: > If I ping either of those hostnames it sends only an A query that’s normal, because the ping-command works only for IPv4. Sincerely, DaB. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http:

Re: What Linux kernel configuration options are required by GPG for --refresh-keys?

On Fri 2015-05-15 07:43:12 -0400, Werner Koch wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2015 04:41, dbdanie...@gmail.com said: > >> # gpg --homedir /etc/pacman.d/gnupg --refresh-keys >> gpg: refreshing 80 keys from hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net >> gpg: keyserver refresh failed: Address family not supported by proto

Re: gnupg migration corrupt db?

On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 13:37 +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > > gpg: keydb_get_keyblock failed: Value not found > > gpg: key 77731557: public key "[User ID not found]" imported > > gpg: key 77731557: failed to re-lookup public key > > Please update to 2.1.4 2.1.2 has some problems skipping PGP-2 keys.

Re: gnupg migration corrupt db?

On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 13:37 +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2015 13:16, berend.de.schou...@gmail.com said: > > > Right now gnupg1 works, but gnupg2 does not. With that, I mean > > gnupg1 > > can decrypt, but gnupg2 cannot decrypt the same files. The reason > > seems to be a failure t

Re: What Linux kernel configuration options are required by GPG for --refresh-keys?

On Thu, 14 May 2015 04:41, dbdanie...@gmail.com said: > # gpg --homedir /etc/pacman.d/gnupg --refresh-keys > gpg: refreshing 80 keys from hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net > gpg: keyserver refresh failed: Address family not supported by protocol DNS tells that there are v6 keyservers but your kernel

Re: gnupg migration corrupt db?

On Thu, 14 May 2015 13:16, berend.de.schou...@gmail.com said: > Right now gnupg1 works, but gnupg2 does not. With that, I mean gnupg1 > can decrypt, but gnupg2 cannot decrypt the same files. The reason > seems to be a failure to read or accept certain secret keys. Are tehse PGP2 keys - they are

Re: Receiving keys by PKA or OpenPGP

On Thu, 14 May 2015 15:46, m...@dabpunkt.eu said: > maybe I’m blind, but how can I receive a key from a pka- or > OpenPGP-DNS-entry without encrypting a (dummy-)file? gpg2 --auto-key-locate clear,nodefault,pka --locate-key ADDRESS Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausna