On 05/22/2015 02:27 AM, Philip Jackson wrote:
The key ID was 0x6e767393
It seems for me that this key has subkey of ECC, and that's the cause
of your trouble.
I think that we need to implement some compatibility feature in GnuPG
2.0 (and 1.4).
Last month, I did a fix, but I think that more is
On 27/05/15 06:22, Rex Kneisley wrote:
As a follow up. Since, version 1.4 is also installed, my assumption
is that using gpg on the command line invokes 1.4, and using gpg2
on the command line invokes 2.x. Is my assumption correct?
Yes.
If so, is there any way to make the command gpg invoke
On 27/05/15 10:36, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
On 05/22/2015 02:27 AM, Philip Jackson wrote:
The key ID was 0x6e767393
It seems for me that this key has subkey of ECC, and that's the cause
of your trouble.
You're right - this key has an ECC subkey for signing. I've imported this key
into another
Hello,
Thank you for more information.
On 05/27/2015 08:53 PM, Philip Jackson wrote:
I tried to re-import it into the original desktop system to see if the problem
recurred. (I should have done that before writing the last mail, to confirm
fault). With the original desktop : gpg 1.4.16 and
Hi,
I know that a CSPRNG is supposed to make this cryptographically secure
Also, I may be wrong here -- it seems that CSPRNG sometimes refers to
libgcrypt's Continuously Seeded and other times refers to
Cryptographically Secure.
Peace, community, justice,
- George
On 27/05/15 15:05, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
It was done soon after 2.0.22. I think that 2.0.23 or later doesn't
have this issue. The signature check is just skipped as unknown algo.
One of the problems with using linux distribution packages. The latest for
Ubuntu 1404 is 2.0.22-3ubuntu1.3 which I
George Lee:
I'm not trying to generate multiple random numbers, but just generate a PGP
key one time in a way that is very hard to crack by basing it on a one-time
seed generated manually in a reliably random way.
I might be wrong here, but as I understand it you need way more often
random
On Sun 2015-05-24 06:58:21 -0400, Peter Lebbing wrote:
It might also be that the package maintainers (hi dkg!) might soon put 2.1.4
into experimental themselves. So it really depends on how far you want to take
this I need the latest and greatest.
Sorry, i'm aware of this but terribly behind
Hello,
On 05/27/2015 10:14 PM, George Lee wrote:
I'm not trying to generate multiple random numbers, but just generate a PGP
key one time in a way that is very hard to crack by basing it on a one-time
seed generated manually in a reliably random way.
I'd understand your point. I interpret it
On Wed 2015-05-27 22:40:44 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Sun 2015-05-24 06:58:21 -0400, Peter Lebbing wrote:
It might also be that the package maintainers (hi dkg!) might soon put 2.1.4
into experimental themselves. So it really depends on how far you want to
take
this I need the
10 matches
Mail list logo
