Re: SmartCard v2.1 : factory reset fails

2017-02-13 Thread NIIBE Yutaka
Hello, Since I got 2.1 card last week, I will test with it. For time being, I say something what I know of. Fib Moro wrote: > I can then successfully change the PIN as well as AdminPIN. > > However, when I try to write a key to the card (gpg --edit-key xxx; > keytocard) I >

Re: Questions about --throw-keyids

2017-02-13 Thread Bjarni Runar Einarsson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > You don't get the luxury to decide on this transition yourself, > i'm afraid. Mailpile has to deal with *other* MUAs doing > throw-keyids, just like those other MUAs have to deal with it >

Re: Questions about --throw-keyids

2017-02-13 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2017-02-13 18:35:17 -0500, Bjarni Runar Einarsson wrote: > Sounds like a nice optimization... but option bloat is a thing too. for an API, there's nothing wrong with explicitly specifying the thing that people should *want* to be doing as a separate interface. GnuPG has some level of

Re: Questions about --throw-keyids

2017-02-13 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2017-02-13 11:54:04 -0500, Lukas Pitschl | GPGTools wrote: >> Am 13.02.2017 um 17:34 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor : >> >> On Mon 2017-02-13 06:41:51 -0500, Bjarni Runar Einarsson wrote: >>> Step two: Encrypt using gpg --throw-keyids. >>> >>> This is easy on the

SmartCard v2.1 : factory reset fails

2017-02-13 Thread Fib Moro
Dear GnuPG-Users List. I'm having trouble with resetting my smartcard version 2.1. After posting a bug report for GnuPG Werner Koch asked me to re-post my question on this mailing list [0]. To answer his quick hint: factory-reset did unfortunately not work as I already mentioned in my

Re: Questions about --throw-keyids

2017-02-13 Thread Lukas Pitschl | GPGTools
> Am 13.02.2017 um 17:34 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor : > > On Mon 2017-02-13 06:41:51 -0500, Bjarni Runar Einarsson wrote: >> Step two: Encrypt using gpg --throw-keyids. >> >> This is easy on the sender's end, but whether this feature can be >> used as a matter of course

Re: Questions about --throw-keyids

2017-02-13 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2017-02-13 06:41:51 -0500, Bjarni Runar Einarsson wrote: > Step two: Encrypt using gpg --throw-keyids. > > This is easy on the sender's end, but whether this feature can be > used as a matter of course depends on how it impacts the > experience of the recipient. Agreed that the recipient's

Questions about --throw-keyids

2017-02-13 Thread Bjarni Runar Einarsson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, Context: I am trying to figure out how much visible metadata I can remove from an encrypted e-mail before it becomes completely unusable. Step one: stripping stuff from the message headers is relatively easy; minimal messages with all

Re: send-keys does not update my key

2017-02-13 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 12/02/17 13:32, Marko Bauhardt wrote: > Hi, > The amor definition of my public key i uploaded > to hkps://hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net differs to the public key > definition i uploaded to another web service. An OpenPGP public key is composed of many parts which can be reordered without

Re: Problems with GPGME1.8 and Python 3.5 bindings

2017-02-13 Thread Justus Winter
Hi :) Jean-François Schaff writes: > I'm new to gpg, and trying to use the Python bindings included in > PGPME. I'm using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. > > I have done the following things: ... > - compiled and installed gpgme-1.8.0 > > Everything seems to build and install as expected,

Re: Keyring operations _very_ slow

2017-02-13 Thread René Pfeiffer
On Feb 10, 2017 at 1610 +, Andrew Gallagher appeared and said: > On 10/02/17 12:57, René Pfeiffer wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I am using gpg and gpg2 with mutt and Icedove/Thunderbird (with Enigmail > > plugin). My public keyring has grown to be very big since the email clients > > auto-import