On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 11:37, di...@webweaving.org said:
> And I really would not mind to be able to refer to subkeys by number -and-
> fpr; as the fpr of a subkey is a but cumbersome to extract afaik (double
> —fingerprint).
Using the number with the quick commands is not a good idea because
anot
> On 21 Jul 2017, at 11:20, Werner Koch wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:32, di...@webweaving.org said:
>
>> Those —quick commands are a huge help. The one thing missing seems to be one
>> for the routine extension of the expiry of subkeys.
>
> In general I think that it is easier to just ad
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:32, di...@webweaving.org said:
> Those —quick commands are a huge help. The one thing missing seems to be one
> for the routine extension of the expiry of subkeys.
In general I think that it is easier to just add a new subkey. However<
I can see that it makes sense for su
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:05, di...@webweaving.org said:
> Thanks - that is a nice treasure trove you unearthed for me. Thanks !
Some examples are give at
https://gnupg.org/faq/whats-new-in-2.1.html#quickgen
> Ok - I’ll need to investigate as to why this does work for our setting (auto
> rene
> On 21 Jul 2017, at 10:05, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>
>>> And then let the batch.commands (which does a complex dance of subkey
>>> renewal and some chip card shuffling) run against that ?
>>
>> Please check wether some of the new --quick-foo commands can be helpful.
>
> Thanks - that is
> On 21 Jul 2017, at 08:46, Werner Koch wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 20:04, di...@webweaving.org said:
>
>> cat batch.commands | gpg2 --no-tty —batch —passphrase-XX XX
>> --command-fd 0 --pinentry-mode loopback …
>
> This is not going to work. --command-fd must always be used in
> co
