Re: E-mail with deniable authentication

2017-09-02 Thread Mario Castelán Castro
On 01/09/17 08:31, Andrew Gallagher wrote: > On 31/08/17 03:35, Mario Castelán Castro wrote: >> Writer and recipient have a Diffie-Hellman key over the same group and >> know each other's public key. >> >> The writer computers the shared secret per the DH algorithm > > This is the real trick

Re: Bitcoin private key from GnuPG secp256k1 secret key?

2017-09-02 Thread Stefan Claas
On Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:00:04 +0900, NIIBE Yutaka wrote: > If someone will make transaction to that address for some amount, I > would resume the development again. :-) As a little proof of concept i converted my sub signing key to a private Bitcoin WIF key and send you some Satoshi. :-) Here

Re: Questions about particular use cases (integrity verification w/o private key, add E flag to primary key, import secp256k1 key)

2017-09-02 Thread Robert J. Hansen
> I thought you could also tell how many keys it was encrypted to, from > the output of gpg --list-packets. Nope. You can tell how many subkeys it was encrypted for, but not how many distinct certificates those represent. If one recipient has 10 subkeys and you encrypt to all 10, there will be

Re: Questions about particular use cases (integrity verification w/o private key, add E flag to primary key, import secp256k1 key)

2017-09-02 Thread MFPA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tuesday 29 August 2017 at 2:24:18 PM, in , Shawn K. Quinn wrote:- > No, that's the whole point of throw-keyids. All > you're supposed to be > able to tell when using that option, is that