On 04/09/18 18:31, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> /usr/bin/gpgv --status-fd 2 --homedir /proc/self/fd/nonexistent --keyring
> sign.pub /proc/self/fd/0
You missed my point. You are not including a slash in the keyring
argument, so gpgv is looking for it in the homedir. To quote the gpgv
man page again:
> Von: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org]
>
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 10:08, roman.fied...@ait.ac.at said:
>
> > [GNUPG:] UNEXPECTED 0
>
> The signature is corrupted in that it has a packet which is expected
> only in a key. Or the provided key has a data signature packet etc.
I hope not :-) If any
On Mon 2018-09-03 09:58:24 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> Just to have it mentioned, turned out this was an issue with missing
> keep-display in gpg-agent.conf, without this the Qt4/5 pinentry fail
> (although I've been told it is not an issue in KDE environment).
to be clear, keep-display
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 10:08, roman.fied...@ait.ac.at said:
> [GNUPG:] UNEXPECTED 0
The signature is corrupted in that it has a packet which is expected
only in a key. Or the provided key has a data signature packet etc.
How did you create the keyfile and the signature?
> Could it be, that
On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 09:52, roman.fied...@ait.ac.at said:
> Werner gave a good solution in another followup message. May I recommend
> updating the online docu/man page for "--verify" with something like this?
we have
Note: Sometimes the use of the @command{gpgv} tool is easier than
using
> Von: Peter Lebbing [mailto:pe...@digitalbrains.com]
>
> On 04/09/18 15:22, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> > I don't understand, could you give commands, expected behaviour and
> > actual output?
>
> To clarify, I thought you were giving an example of "starting gpgv
> without any keyring at all",
On 04/09/18 15:22, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> I don't understand, could you give commands, expected behaviour and
> actual output?
To clarify, I thought you were giving an example of "starting gpgv
without any keyring at all", because you gave it a non-existing homedir.
Only on re-reading your other
On 04/09/18 10:08, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> /usr/bin/gpgv --status-fd 2 --homedir /proc/self/fd/nonexistent --keyring
> key.pub data.gpg
This would open /proc/self/fd/nonexistent/key.pub as the keyring.
From the man page of gpgv:
> Add file to the list of keyrings. If file begins
On 04/09/18 13:55, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> This might be an issue, but now I tried also with the "pubring.kbx" file
> from the key used to create the signature (without exporting anything)
> and the error message stays completely the same.
I don't understand, could you give commands, expected
> Von: Peter Lebbing [mailto:pe...@digitalbrains.com]
>
> On 04/09/18 09:52, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> > Maybe the current hammer documentation should be updated, to remove
> > the "--use-as-hammer" options? Or at least declare, that they shall not
> > be used that way. See:
> >
> >
Hi Roland,
I don't know if you have some specific questions but the Debian wiki
page about Subkeys is nice: https://wiki.debian.org/Subkeys
tl;dr version is primary/subkey setup lets you have your primary key
completely offline and use subkeys for daily work. If something bad
happens to a subkey
On 04.09.2018 10:29, Roland Siemons (P) wrote:
> Remains:
> How can I see what is on the smartcard?
gpg --card-status
> How can I copy files to the smartcard?
You can't copy generic files, smartcard contains only private keys (gpg
--edit-key X, keytocard) and a small amount of data objects (gpg
On 04/09/18 10:17, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> And I have just confirmed (by sending that mail) that both the first
> auth operation AND the first signing operation fail, separately.
I have no idea, it's quite curious. As an added bread crumb to follow:
what do the PIN retry counters say after the
On 04/09/18 09:52, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> Maybe the current hammer documentation should be updated, to remove
> the "--use-as-hammer" options? Or at least declare, that they shall not
> be used that way. See:
>
> https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/r1606.html
>
Dear GnuPG
As a user of GPG4Win, is there any explanation in the compendium about
the meaning and use of subkeys (I cannot find anything about that matter
in the The Gpg4win Compendium 3.0.0)
Best regards,
--
Roland Siemons
0xAEEC5E2ED87628F5.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
@ Dirk Gottschalk: Thanks for very effective response to my first question!
Remains:
How can I see what is on the smartcard?
How can I copy files to the smartcard?
I studied the GnuPG Smartcard How-To
(www.gnupg.org/howtos/card-howto/en/smartcard-howto.html), but that is
entirely linux oriented.
On 04/09/18 09:11, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I've had a pgp smartcard v2.1 for years now (two, actually), and I've
> noticed that no matter what operation I perform, the first attempt after
> inserting the card, or waking from sleep with the card inserted, fails.
And I have just
Hi, all.
I've had a pgp smartcard v2.1 for years now (two, actually), and I've
noticed that no matter what operation I perform, the first attempt after
inserting the card, or waking from sleep with the card inserted, fails.
Example:
```
andrewg@fred:~$ ssh my.server
sign_and_send_pubkey:
> Von: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org]
>
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 19:25, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
>
> > It could be that recently an option was added to check a signature by a
> > certificate in a file, but in general you need to import a certificate
>
> No, that is nlot the case. We only
> Von: Peter Lebbing [mailto:pe...@digitalbrains.com]
>
> On 03/09/18 18:56, Fiedler Roman wrote:
> > With gpg1 a similar command should have verified, that the signature
> > is exactly from the single public key stored in "key.pub".
>
> This has never been a supported use of gpg, it just happened
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 19:25, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
> It could be that recently an option was added to check a signature by a
> certificate in a file, but in general you need to import a certificate
No, that is nlot the case. We only added the option -f to encrypt to a
key taken from a
21 matches
Mail list logo
