On Thu 1 Aug, 2019, 9:20 PM Werner Koch, wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 15:57, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
>
> > Where can I find information on what commands are supported by
> > S.gpg-agent and S.gpg-agent.extra socket? I am looking for some
> > information which clearly differentiates these two
Playfair via Gnupg-users:
> On 8/1/19 7:37 AM, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:43, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
>>> it that way", i think. Perhaps Werner can provide more background on
>>> why GnuPG is generally resistant to holding OpenPGP certificates that
>>> have no
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 09:27, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
> We're already in uncharted waters with the inevitable abuse of SKS, we
> need to figure out how to stabilize the ecosystem.
Most businesses do not use public keyservers at all but use their
internal PKI.
> If the PGP implementation of Open
On 8/1/19 7:37 AM, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:43, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
>> it that way", i think. Perhaps Werner can provide more background on
>> why GnuPG is generally resistant to holding OpenPGP certificates that
>> have no User ID at all in its local key
Hello,
Do you have any ideas why am getting multiple lines of:
gpg: skipped packet of type 12 in keybox
Thanks
David
--
People Should Not Be Afraid Of Their Government - Their Government
Should Be Afraid Of The People - When Injustice Becomes Law, REBELLION
Becomes A DUTY! Join the Rebellion
Daniel Kahn Gillmor via Gnupg-users [2019-08-01T09:27:45-04] wrote:
> Here's one use case (i've got others if you want):
>
> * You have my OpenPGP certificate (with userid with e-mail address),
>but it is not published in full publicly because i do not want people
>to be able to find anyt
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 15:57, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
> Where can I find information on what commands are supported by
> S.gpg-agent and S.gpg-agent.extra socket? I am looking for some
> information which clearly differentiates these two sockets.
Here is an overview on the allowed commands for t
Friedhelm Waitzmann wrote:
> Stefan Claas:
>
> >I lsign Bob's key so third parties do not know (normally) that I did
> >this. But how could my friend Alice trust Bob's key she has without
> >my non-exportable lsign sig?
>
> >What I tried to propose is an additional parameter, like --add-me
> >wh
On Thu 2019-08-01 13:37:26 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> The user ID is important because the accompanying self-signature conveys
> important information about the keyblock. For example expiration date
> and preferences. It is true that this can also be conveyed with
> direct-key-signatures (a self
On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:43, gnupg-users@gnupg.org said:
> it that way", i think. Perhaps Werner can provide more background on
> why GnuPG is generally resistant to holding OpenPGP certificates that
> have no User ID at all in its local keyring.
The user ID is important because the accompanying se
Stefan Claas:
>I lsign Bob's key so third parties do not know (normally) that I did
>this. But how could my friend Alice trust Bob's key she has without
>my non-exportable lsign sig?
>What I tried to propose is an additional parameter, like --add-me
>which would write a 'blob' to a second file.db
Andrew Gallagher:
> On 31/07/2019 13:36, David wrote:
>> Enigmail always defaults to the first set of keys one created
>
> Enigmail will default to the first set of keys in your keyring that
> matches the selection criteria. Do you have more than one ID on each
> key? Do you have more than one key
12 matches
Mail list logo
