12021/00/04 08:01.47 ನಲ್ಲಿ, markus.ro...@neverbox.com ಬರೆದರು:
>
> On 2021-01-05 Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users - gnupg-users@gnupg.org wrote:
> > ... but why are then SKS key servers
> > still in operation, which allows third parties to look up who signed
> > who's key and with what trust level
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 12:09 AM Stefan Claas
wrote:
> What you say would fit more for a cross-platform OpenSource app
> like Bitmessage, compared to PGP's or GnuPG's privacy philosophy.
Regarding Bitmessage and OpenPGP. There was an announcement
made last year about an Bitmessage OpenPGP chan, w
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 9:05 PM wrote:
>
> On 2021-01-05 Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users - gnupg-users@gnupg.org wrote:
> > ... but why are then SKS key servers
> > still in operation, which allows third parties to look up who signed
> > who's key and with what trust level and GnuPG's WoT support,
> The landscape has changed dramatically from the times when the
> original PGP fundamentals were introduced. Today, for any secure
> personal communication system to be of practical use, it must
> be designed from the ground up observing the following simple
> principle: *anonymity is the necessar
On 2021-01-05 Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users - gnupg-users@gnupg.org wrote:
... but why are then SKS key servers
still in operation, which allows third parties to look up who signed
who's key and with what trust level and GnuPG's WoT support, compared
to sq and Hagrid?
The landscape has chang
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 09:46:01AM -0500, Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 15:38 +0100, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > Virtually nobody uses the WoT...
>
> Strangely, the Linux kernel folks still use it a decent amount.
> They're the only large group I can
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 3:44 PM Werner Koch via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 07:27, Jean-David Beyer said:
>
> > Building a web of trust is so hopeless, from my point of view, that I
> > have abandonned gnupg. I have made keys for myself, obtained enigmail
>
> Virtually nobody uses th
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:46, Robert J. Hansen said:
> Strangely, the Linux kernel folks still use it a decent amount.
There are indeed use cases for the WoT; in particular if you don't known
your co-worker. However, in commerical or private settings the
communication patterns are different from t
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:27:14AM -0500, Jean-David Beyer via Gnupg-users
wrote:
> Building a web of trust is so hopeless, from my point of view, that I have
> abandonned gnupg. I have made keys for myself, obtained enigmail for my
> Firefox browser, etc. But those with whom I correspond by e-mai
On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 15:38 +0100, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Virtually nobody uses the WoT...
Strangely, the Linux kernel folks still use it a decent amount.
They're the only large group I can think of offhand, though.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message pa
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 07:27, Jean-David Beyer said:
> Building a web of trust is so hopeless, from my point of view, that I
> have abandonned gnupg. I have made keys for myself, obtained enigmail
Virtually nobody uses the WoT. What people use are direct key
signatures. That is you verify a key's
On 1/5/21 8:24 AM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:27:14AM -0500, Jean-David Beyer via Gnupg-users
wrote:
Building a web of trust is so hopeless, from my point of view, that I have
abandonned gnupg. I have made keys for myself, obtained enigmail for my
Firefox browser, et
On 1/4/21 9:31 PM, ï¿œngel wrote:
Finally, every user will need to discard their now-useless keys,
generate new ones and rebuild the chain of turst from the ground up.
Building a web of trust is so hopeless, from my point of view, that I
have abandonned gnupg. I have made keys for myself, obta
13 matches
Mail list logo
