Re: Application deadlock when using GnuPG, gpgsm, and Scute

2023-04-11 Thread Simon Josefsson via Gnupg-users
vuori writes: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:50:39AM +0200, Simon Josefsson via Gnupg-users > wrote: >> Are there well-maintained debian packages for GnuPG 2.4 anywhere? I >> recently ran into yet another bug that has been fixed in later versions >> that Debian/Trisquel doesn't ship, so wondered

Re: Application deadlock when using GnuPG, gpgsm, and Scute

2023-04-11 Thread vuori
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:50:39AM +0200, Simon Josefsson via Gnupg-users wrote: > Are there well-maintained debian packages for GnuPG 2.4 anywhere? I > recently ran into yet another bug that has been fixed in later versions > that Debian/Trisquel doesn't ship, so wondered this recently as well.

Re: Application deadlock when using GnuPG, gpgsm, and Scute

2023-04-11 Thread Simon Josefsson via Gnupg-users
Werner Koch via Gnupg-users writes: > I am sorry, for the Debian troubles - we actually had 2.3 in Sid already > 2 years ago. AFAICS the problem is that the Debian maintainer seems to > be in a conflict between being Sequoia contributor and maintainer, > OpenPGP WG Chair and also long time

Re: Application deadlock when using GnuPG, gpgsm, and Scute

2023-04-11 Thread Werner Koch via Gnupg-users
On Sun, 9 Apr 2023 19:13, John Scott said: > You're a genius! I actually had a hard time getting Scute 1.7.0 to > compile, so I built it from Git instead and everything worked > flawlessly! I was even able to sign a PDF :) FWIW, we are even working on Poppler to integrate GnuPG without the need