On 2023-01-05 13:51, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2023 02:50:25 CET Jackson Chen via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > i had enabled KeePassXC secret service integration (some free desktop
> > standard). when i use my secret GPG/PGP keys, i get prompted by KeePassXC
> > to unlock the
On 2022-12-01 17:42, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Hi friends of GnuPG,
>
> seems to be a good time to start an official Mastodon account
> for GnuPG and related topics like Gpg4win and OpenPGP.
>
> At least for announcements and some interaction as the interest
> is growing for this decentral
On 2022-08-09 22:23, Ángel wrote:
> On 2022-08-04 at 18:58 +0200, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > So is there any other way to run find and some other script to find
> > suspicious files? Google is not really helpful
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Uwe Brauer
>
> If you suffer a ransomware
Hi,
I just check for a list of ransomware filename patterns (e.g.
*.cryptotorlocker*).
Best regards,
Jan
On 2022-08-04 18:58, Uwe Brauer via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> I apologize for this message that can be a bit off topic.
> (I am on Ubuntu 16.04)
>
> How can I find say encrypted
On 2022-06-09 12:52, Jan Eden via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On 2022-06-09 10:40, Werner Koch wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 08:11, Jan Eden said:
> >
> > > Now I corrected the mistake, and all is well.
> >
> > I don't think this is your mistake. We need to do some
On 2022-06-09 22:13, Jan Eden via Gnupg-users wrote:
>
> On 2022-06-09 21:40, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > On Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2022 17:38:04 CEST Mark via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > > I just looked at what Kleopatra has it set for and it has it set for
> > > hkp://keys.g
On 2022-06-09 21:40, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2022 17:38:04 CEST Mark via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > I just looked at what Kleopatra has it set for and it has it set for
> > hkp://keys.gnupg.net as well. I'm guessing that is no longer the best
> > choice?
>
> Kleopatra
On 2022-06-09 12:08, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/06/2022 11:50, Jan Eden wrote:
> > jan ~ % gpg --refresh-key 0xFB73E21AF1163937
> > gpg: refreshing 1 key from hkp://pgp.surf.nl
> > gpg: key FB73E21AF1163937: "Andrew Gallagher " not
> > changed
> > gpg: Total number processed: 1
> > gpg:
On 2022-06-09 10:40, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 08:11, Jan Eden said:
>
> > Now I corrected the mistake, and all is well.
>
> I don't think this is your mistake. We need to do something about it.
> Tracked at https://dev.gnupg.org/T6023
>
> BTW, to ignore local keys and update
On 2022-06-09 11:37, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/06/2022 07:11, Jan Eden wrote:
> > PS. The key used to sign your message seems to be expired.
>
> That could be because you already had my key in your keyring and it
> wasn't recently (i.e. in the last 18 months) refreshed. What does it say
>
On 2022-06-08 22:51, Andrew Gallagher via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On 8 Jun 2022, at 07:46, Jan Eden via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
> >
> > - Which WKD server hosts my expired/revoked key such that it takes
> > precedence
> > over my own WKD server at domain.com <ht
Hi,
I just configured WKD on my server, and
gpg -v --auto-key-locate clear,wkd,nodefault --locate-key u...@domain.com
works as expected for most of my uid/key combos, except for one address
(oldu...@domain.com) which is linked to both a current and a revoked
key. The output of the above command
Hi,
I just configured WKD on my server, and
gpg -v --auto-key-locate clear,wkd,nodefault --locate-key u...@domain.com
works as expected for most of my uid/key combos, except for one address
(oldu...@domain.com) which is linked to both a current and a revoked
key. The output of the above command
13 matches
Mail list logo
