Re: Usability of OpenSSL vs GNUPG

On 12/17/19, 9:55 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > One of my repeated complaints about GnuPG is that nobody can agree on > what it is. Is it a toolkit for building bespoke cryptographic > solutions? Is it an RFC4880 implementation meant for end-users? Is it > an RFC4880 implementation meant fo

Re: Calling GnuPG ME library from managed .NET

Hi Markus, On 1/24/2019 5:45 AM, Markus Vetsch wrote: Hello, we have integrated GnuPG via command line interface into our Windows client & server C#.NET application. We are aware that the recommended way to interact with GnuPG is the library GnuPG ME. That's why we would like to switch for be

Re: What could make GnuPG + Enigmail "easier"?

On 4/9/2017 6:24 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote: There's been some discussion both on and off this list about the fact that people don't use GnuPG (even with Enigmail) because it's 'too hard'. I have friends that are reasonably intelligent who just can't figure it out and, for the life of me, I just

Test mail from Outlook

Just a simple test message as asked by Werner to test something… Jeff ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

RE: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

Aha! This makes a lot of sense. Thanks Werner! Jeff > -Original Message- > From: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org] > Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 4:33 AM > To: Jeffrey Stedfast > Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org > Subject: Re: Problems with GPGME returning &q

Re: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

Gah I hate Outlook which makes replying inline impossible :\ Outlook will indent but not add “> “ to quoted lines, so be aware of that as you read this email ( On 3/6/17, 9:41 AM, "Werner Koch" wrote: On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:20, jeste...@microsoft.com said: > I'm working on re-impl

Re: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

Hey Werner, No worries – I know how busy things can get around a release. Jeff On 3/4/17, 7:01 AM, "Werner Koch" wrote: Hi Jeff, On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 19:04, jeste...@microsoft.com said: > Anyone have any thoughts on this? Soneone of us will get back to you on Monday.

Re: Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

Anyone have any thoughts on this? On 2/27/17, 9:20 AM, "Gnupg-users on behalf of Jeffrey Stedfast" wrote: Hi all, I'm working on re-implementing GMime to use libgpgme (1.8.0 on Fedora 25) instead of using my own custom logic for fork()ing/exec()ing gpg &

Problems with GPGME returning "Not Implemented" or "Configuration error"

Hi all, I'm working on re-implementing GMime to use libgpgme (1.8.0 on Fedora 25) instead of using my own custom logic for fork()ing/exec()ing gpg & parsing the status-fd output to do PGP encryption and I've gotten that to work just fine for PGP, but I am having trouble using nearly identical l

Creating self-signed S/MIME certificates

I'm working on implementing S/MIME support in my GMime library and need to create a set of keys for some unit tests. Is there any way I can create some self-signed S/MIME certificates with gpgsm? Thanks, Jeff ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@

Creating self-signed S/MIME certificate

I'm working on implementing S/MIME support in my GMime library and need to create a set of keys for some unit tests. Is there any way I can create some self-signed S/MIME certificates with gpgsm? Thanks, Jeff ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@g