Re: PGP 6.5.8 ckt,?just say no.

2008-10-29 Thread David Shaw
On Oct 28, 2008, at 2:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on Tue Oct 28 17:00:07 CET 2008 : Now that is an... interesting key. It's a V4 (OpenPGP) key with V3 (PGP 2.x) binding signature). GPG won't cross-certify such a key because it is a one-way

Re: PGP 6.5.8 ckt,?just say no.

2008-10-28 Thread David Shaw
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:48:21AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:42:14 -0400 From: David Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PGP 6.5.8 ckt, just say no. (was: Re: set type digest mode? On Oct 24, 2008, at 10:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [1] any ckt V4

Re: PGP 6.5.8 ckt,?just say no.

2008-10-28 Thread vedaal
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com wrote on Tue Oct 28 17:00:07 CET 2008 : Now that is an... interesting key. It's a V4 (OpenPGP) key with V3 (PGP 2.x) binding signature). GPG won't cross-certify such a key because it is a one-way change. Once cross-certified, the binding signature will be V4

Re: PGP 6.5.8 ckt,?just say no.

2008-10-28 Thread Eric Anopolsky
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 14:49 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so, is there any way that gnupg *could* do it? (i.e. --ignore-v3-signature --unchangeable-expiration-date --cross-certify-just-do-it-override) or any other really cool undocumented option ;-) *NOT* a feature request, i can

PGP 6.5.8 ckt, just say no. (was: Re: set type digest mode? plus other query)

2008-10-24 Thread David Shaw
On Oct 24, 2008, at 10:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [1] any ckt V4 rsa keys generated, have the rsa subkey as both sign and encrypt, and there is (as yet, afaik,) no way that gnupg can be used to get such a key to cross-certify the primary key, and since the subkey will be used by default by