On Tue 2019-10-22 21:28:53 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Thu 2019-10-17 11:08:46 +, Bjarni Runar Einarsson wrote:
>> Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>> I'd be happy to set up such a tracker at (say)
>>> https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/web-key-directory/issues if folks
>>> ar
On Thu 2019-10-17 11:08:46 +, Bjarni Runar Einarsson wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> I'd be happy to set up such a tracker at (say)
>> https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/web-key-directory/issues if folks
>> are OK with it.
>>
>> Werner, does that sound OK to you?
>
> This sounds good to me,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello!
Thanks for the comments, guys!
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> >
> > I thing gnupg-devel@ gnupg.org would be an appropriate place for
> > discussing such topics.
>
...
> If we want general e-mail discussion about WKD concerns, i'd
> suggest u
On Tue 2019-10-15 23:01:33 +0200, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:06, Bjarni Runar Einarsson said:
>
>> Would the GnuPG issue tracker be a good place to file "bug
>> reports" against the spec, to work towards clarifications?
>
> That is okay for bug reports, but often it
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:06, Bjarni Runar Einarsson said:
> Would the GnuPG issue tracker be a good place to file "bug
> reports" against the spec, to work towards clarifications?
That is okay for bug reports, but often it is more important to get the
opinions from more people than those who triage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello GnuPG-users!
We had some really interesting discussions about WKD at the
OpenPGP e-mail summit. One of the recurring themes at many
sessions was WKD: it's becoming more and more important and
people are both deploying and relying on it.
Howev
