Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME

On Thu, 17 May 2018 13:11, roman.fied...@ait.ac.at said: > How could that work together with the memory based "wipe" approach, you > envisioned in your message > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2018-May/060379.html , last > paragraph? Tha is a different layer. Basically a part

AW: AW: AW: AW: Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME

> Von: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org] > > On Wed, 16 May 2018 16:24, roman.fied...@ait.ac.at said: > > > In my opinion it is hard to find such a "one size fits all" > > solution. Like Werner's example: disabling decryption streaming > > The goal of the MDC is to assure that the message has

Re: AW: AW: AW: Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME

On Wed, 16 May 2018 16:24, roman.fied...@ait.ac.at said: > In my opinion it is hard to find such a "one size fits all" > solution. Like Werner's example: disabling decryption streaming The goal of the MDC is to assure that the message has been received exactly as the sender set it. Thus there

AW: AW: AW: Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME

> Von: Andrew Gallagher [mailto:andr...@andrewg.com] > > > On 16 May 2018, at 13:44, Fiedler Roman > wrote: > > > > I am not sure, if gpg could support > > implementation/testing/life-cycle-efforts > to establish all those parameters and different process models for most