On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 09:03 +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 19:25, mgo...@gentoo.org said:
>
> > of the key with subkey revoked, and use that for the purpose. However,
> > I think it would be much more convenient if had an option to generate
> > the revocation signature
On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 19:25, mgo...@gentoo.org said:
> of the key with subkey revoked, and use that for the purpose. However,
> I think it would be much more convenient if had an option to generate
> the revocation signature separately.
Can you please enter a feature request at dev.gnupg.org?
Thanks for your e-mail. Please note that I am away from the office at the
moment. If your enquiry is of an urgent nature please call the office on
01752-500511 or e-mail m...@cleverstudentlets.com.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 19:25:38 +0100, Michał Górny stated:
>Hello,
>
>I'd like to ask whether it'd be feasible to have an option to generate
>revocation certificate that revokes one (or more?) subkeys rather than
>the whole key.
>
>Our use case involves signing key kept on a server for the purpose
Hello,
I'd like to ask whether it'd be feasible to have an option to generate
revocation certificate that revokes one (or more?) subkeys rather than
the whole key.
Our use case involves signing key kept on a server for the purpose of
automated signatures. We'd like to keep the secret portion
of
