At Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:45:39 +0300,
Teemu Likonen wrote:
> I don't know whether my thinking is common but perhaps it would be
> helpful if gpg's man page made clear that on conflict situation both
> keys go to "ask" mode. A quote from my gpg 2.1.18 manual:
I tried to improve the documentation in 2
At Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:22:23 +0200,
Peter Lebbing wrote:
> On 23/06/17 12:56, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> > It's up to the GPG client to interpret it. This document (authored by
> > Andre and me) has some recommendations for MUAs:
>
> Ah! Thanks for the information.
>
> I was thinking about how Gn
On 23/06/17 12:56, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> It's up to the GPG client to interpret it. This document (authored by
> Andre and me) has some recommendations for MUAs:
Ah! Thanks for the information.
I was thinking about how GnuPG handled it, i.e., on the gpg command line
or as a backend for some
At Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:52:48 +0200,
Peter Lebbing wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On 23/06/17 11:14, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> > No, both keys are set to ask. The key with a lot of observed
> > signatures could be bad. This could occur, if there is a MitM, but
> > the MitM has a small lapse, because, perhaps
On 23/06/17 11:14, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> No, both keys are set to ask. The key with a lot of observed
> signatures could be bad. This could occur, if there is a MitM, but
> the MitM has a small lapse, because, perhaps, you've used an
> unintercepted network path to retreive the "new" signatur
Neal H. Walfield [2017-06-23 11:14:31+02] wrote:
> At Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:32:48 +0300, Teemu Likonen wrote:
>> Then let's say I have a key which has been used to verify hundred or
>> so signatures. In --status-fd's TOFU_STATS it gets higher
>> value, say 4. Then the keyring gets a new key with co
At Thu, 22 Jun 2017 20:32:48 +0300,
Teemu Likonen wrote:
> Teemu Likonen [2017-06-22 09:42:50+03] wrote:
> > Does the SUMMARY field's value (0-4) have effect on how key's validity
> > is calculated or how TOFU conflicts are resolved or presented to a
> > user?
>
> I didn't get answers yet but I'll
At Thu, 22 Jun 2017 09:42:50 +0300,
Teemu Likonen wrote:
> It _seems_ to me that
>
> - Field 3 :: validity - A number with validity code.
>
> is the same thing as SUMMARY in TOFU_STATS. Am I right?
>
> And here's my question again: Does the SUMMARY field's value (0-4) have
> effect on how
Teemu Likonen [2017-06-22 09:42:50+03] wrote:
> Does the SUMMARY field's value (0-4) have effect on how key's validity
> is calculated or how TOFU conflicts are resolved or presented to a
> user?
I didn't get answers yet but I'll speculate a bit on the subject. This
is all about "trust-model tofu
Are TOFU statistics used for key's validity calculations or TOFU
conflict resolution?
Some background: The TOFU system keeps statistics about key's use. I'll
quote some lines from the DETAILS document.
About --with-colons --witt-tofu-info --list-keys:
*** TFS - TOFU statistics
This
10 matches
Mail list logo
