Am 27 Feb 2008 um 19:47 hat Werner Koch geschrieben:
The solution to this is pretty clear, we need to read all public key
encrypted packets first and sort them so that own keys come first
followed by other keys and finally by the wild card keys. This also
allows us to order the trial
Am 27 Feb 2008 um 13:23 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:55:28PM +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
What I meant, was something like this mockup:
==
C:\gpg --recipient-keys ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg
gpg: file ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg was encrypted to the following
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:23:34 -0500, David Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
David On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:55:28PM +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
[...]
C:\gpg --recipient-keys ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg
[...]
So at least three people think it would be a good addition.
David Why?
Am 28 Feb 2008 um 10:04 hat Wilhelm Müller geschrieben:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:23:34 -0500, David Shaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
David Why?
David I'm serious - what is the use case here? How often do
David people need to list all recipients of a file?
I agree with David,
Am 26 Feb 2008 um 9:55 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
Am 26 Feb 2008 um 8:48 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
1. If there are several recipients, test the given passphrase
automatically for all secret keys in your keyring, so that you don't
have to give for example 9 times a wrong
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 10:00 +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
You don't believe me to enter 9 times a complete passphrase, do you?
You are right, that it is possible to live with it, but why not
implement something more comfortable if it doesn't lower the security
level?
While pgpdump
Dirk Traulsen dirk.traulsen at lypso.de
wrote on Wed Feb 27 10:00:25 CET 2008
You don't believe me to enter 9 times a complete passphrase, do
you?
i agree with you completely that it would be a major annoyance to
have to enter a complete passphrase, even 3 times,
and certainly would be very
vedaal at hush.com vedaal at hush.com
wrote o Wed Feb 27 15:51:05 CET 2008
What I meant, was something like this mockup:
==
C:\gpg --recipient-keys ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg
gpg: file ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg was encrypted to the following keys:
actually, gnupg already does this when
Am 27 Feb 2008 um 9:51 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
Dirk Traulsen dirk.traulsen at lypso.de
wrote on Wed Feb 27 10:00:25 CET 2008
You don't believe me to enter 9 times a complete passphrase, do
you?
i agree with you completely that it would be a major annoyance to
have to enter
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:55:28PM +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
What I meant, was something like this mockup:
==
C:\gpg --recipient-keys ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg
gpg: file ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg was encrypted to the following keys:
i agree, and would welcome this as well,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
pressing the 'enter' key 9 times quickly, is something i can live
with without bothering the developers
Well, I sometimes receive mails encrypted to 20 or so keys and some of
them use the wild card keyid (-R) feature. Now, this is not a
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com
wrote on Wed Feb 27 19:23:34 CET 2008 :
By the way:
gpg --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /dev/null the-file.gpg
.....
what is the correct command on 'windows' ?
TIA,
vedaal
any ads or links
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com
wrote on Wed Feb 27 19:23:34 CET 2008 :
By the way:
gpg --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /dev/null the-file.gpg
what is the correct command on Windows ?
gpg --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring nul the-file.gpg
or if you
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:17:01 -0500 John Clizbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
By the way:
gpg --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /dev/null the-
file.gpg
what is the correct command on Windows ?
gpg --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring nul the-file.gpg
i can't get it to work :-((
i get the
Hi!
Dirk Traulsen schrieb:
b. some keys do not belong to me in a common keyring.
I am really not sure whether that is a good idea at all.
Granting other people (write!) access to my secret keyring would be a
troubling thought, even though I am not currently aware of any practical
exploits.
Am 26 Feb 2008 um 9:40 hat Sven Radde geschrieben:
Hi!
Dirk Traulsen schrieb:
b. some keys do not belong to me in a common keyring.
I am really not sure whether that is a good idea at all. Granting other
people (write!) access to my secret keyring would be a troubling
thought, even
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:48:57 +0100
From: Dirk Traulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How know who is a file encrypted for ?
1. If there are several recipients, test the given passphrase
automatically for all secret keys in your keyring, so that you
don't
have to give for example 9 times
Am 8 Feb 2008 um 15:23 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:07:21PM +0100, Sebastien Chassot wrote:
Hi,
I can't find how list who's a file encrypted for ? I've encrypt several
files with different recipients, but I don't remember which.
Just run 'gpg' on the file,
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 09:59 +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
If you are the third recipient, you have to give 6 times a wrong
password until you can finally input the correct one. This gets real
fun when there are ten recipients...
It would be nice, if
1. gpg would take the password and
gpg --list-packets should give you a clue
- Original Message
From: Sebastien Chassot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dirk Traulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GnuPG mailing list gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:29:43 AM
Subject: Re: How know who is a file encrypted
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 08:01 -0800, Tracy D. Bossong wrote:
gpg --list-packets should give you a clue
Yes true! I'm not use using it cos it's only mentioned in man page and
not in help (and I don't rtfm enough ;)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Am 25 Feb 2008 um 8:01 hat Tracy D. Bossong geschrieben:
gpg --list-packets should give you a clue
No, it does not!
gpg --list-packets file.gpg does the same as gpg file.gpg.
The only difference is that gpg gives additional packet information
before asking the passphrases three times for
: Re: How know who is a file encrypted for ?
Am
25
Feb
2008
um
8:01
hat
Tracy
D.
Bossong
geschrieben:
gpg
--list-packets
should
give
you
a
clue
No,
it
does
not!
gpg
--list-packets
file.gpg
does
the
same
as
gpg
file.gpg.
The
only
difference
is
that
gpg
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:27:56 PM
Subject: Re: How know who is a file encrypted for ?
Am
25
Feb
2008
um
8:01
hat
Tracy
D.
Bossong
geschrieben:
gpg
--list-packets
should
give
you
a
clue
No,
it
does
not!
gpg
--list-packets
file.gpg
Hi,
I can't find how list who's a file encrypted for ? I've encrypt several
files with different recipients, but I don't remember which.
In general how can I make difference between file encrypted for one
user, several user ? symmetric encrypted, asymmetric ?
Thank you.
--
Sebastien
25 matches
Mail list logo
