However, I would like to question your need for requiring two gpg keys.
How are they two gpg going to be more secure?
Guessing that possibly two different people need to be in agreement in
order to access data, along the lines of needing two keys to launch
missiles? :)
Otherwise, I agree
On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 11:01 PM Ángel wrote:
> You could use a wrapper which calls gpg twice, while the user only
> calls your wrapper (as if it is gpg) once.
>
Thank you, I think that sounds like the best solution I've come across so
far! =)
> However, I would like to question your need for
On 2021-12-26 at 04:47 +0100, Christian Chavez wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've currently got some sensitive data I'd like to require _two_ gpg
> keys for decryption/unlocking.
>
> As in both are needed (AND operation), not that either can decrypt on
> their own (OR operation).
> I can only find
A small correction:
On Sun, 26 Dec 2021, 04:47 Christian Chavez, wrote:
(...)
> As in both are needed (AND operation), not that either can decrypt on
> their own (OR operation).
> I can only find description of AND operation in manpages/tutorials online.
>
The second line is supposed to read "I
Christian Chavez via Gnupg-users writes:
> Hi!
>
> I've currently got some sensitive data I'd like to require _two_ gpg keys for
> decryption/unlocking.
>
> As in both are needed (AND operation), not that either can decrypt on their
> own (OR operation).
> I can only find description of AND
Hi!
I've currently got some sensitive data I'd like to require _two_ gpg keys
for decryption/unlocking.
As in both are needed (AND operation), not that either can decrypt on their
own (OR operation).
I can only find description of AND operation in manpages/tutorials online.
I'm hoping for a
