On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:49, martin-gnupg-us...@dkyb.de said:
think. Because your world seems to be the more righteous and calm place
and I wish I didn't have to worry about the future of free societies as
I can't read that from Robert's mails. IIRC, the main point here was
that traffic
I can't read that from Robert's mails. IIRC, the main point here was
that traffic analysis is a much more powerful tool than wholesale
content analysis.
I am not in a position to know whether it is for a fact, but that agrees
with my understanding.
My other position is that we have to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 18.03.2014 15:01, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
My other position is that we have to be careful what we believe.
In these times it's tempting to see shadows and jump at them,
believing that we're seeing the bogeyman. We have to resist this
Quoting Martin Behrendt martin-gnupg-us...@dkyb.de:
Sorry if I sound cynical but the bogeyman says hallo [1]:
Strange: when my nephews were young they would also pass on messages
from the Thing That Lived In The Closet. (They never called it the
bogeyman. Just That Thing That Lives In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 18.03.2014 19:34, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
(1) Given how many flat wrong things get printed in the newspaper,
believing this reporting may not be wise.
While this in general is true, I really wonder why you say that in the
current context.
I apologize for having triggered the emotionally agitated exchange in
this thread culminating in someone bringing up the German-Jew trauma.
I did not intend this and will try to make future points in a more
moderate language. I acknowledge the outburst of true emotion by the
person I responded to
The YYY (-a famous three letter agency) e.g. denies to archive content
of YYY citizens mails. It is thus perfectly reasonable to assume it does
so with all other ones.
This is not a reasonable inference.
I deny being able to violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Is it
perfectly
That is an odd comparison. What does a statement about a fundamental
law of physics which you can't change have to do with a statement
about what you are doing, where you are perfectly free to do something
else than you say?
Try some variations.
I deny that I've ever been to Vienna; is it
Am 17.03.2014 17:54, schrieb Robert J. Hansen:
That is an odd comparison. What does a statement about a fundamental
law of physics which you can't change have to do with a statement
about what you are doing, where you are perfectly free to do something
else than you say?
Try some
The NSA e.g. denies to archive content of us-american citizens mails. It is
thus perfectly reasonable to assume it does so with all other ones.
They also deny being able to violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics:
is it thus perfectly reasonable to assume they can violate the other
ones?
You know what? To hell with it. I /will/ celebrate his birthday,
just ten years late.
Days. *Days* late. :)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 14/03/14 16:06, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
The NSA e.g. denies to archive content of us-american citizens mails.
It is
thus perfectly reasonable to assume it does so with all other ones.
They also deny being able to violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics:
is it thus perfectly reasonable to
So far theres no credible reporting that any government is doing mass
surveillance of email content. Instead, mass surveillance focuses on
metadata: whos talking to whom, when, with what for a subject line,
routed through which mail servers, and so on.
The NSA e.g. denies to archive
Totally off-topic. But that your father was a highly positioned
judge, would make you rather biased.
Sure, just like someone being German would make them pretty biased
against Jews.
What I just said was insensitive, offensive, and completely
inappropriate. So, too, was what you just
On 14/03/14 17:28, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
Totally off-topic. But that your father was a highly positioned
judge, would make you rather biased.
Sure, just like someone being German would make them pretty biased
against Jews.
What I just said was insensitive, offensive, and completely
But I do know loads of German's, which of course, with you making
such statements, not only shows that you have a serious problem, if
you have to offend people, just because you feel offended, but also
shows how ignorant you are.
You are missing the point.
It is contemptible to believe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I want to achieve the following:
1. A Master signing key
2. A subkey signing/enc pair for my normal machine
3. A subkey signing/enc pair for e.g. my mobile device
What I want to do is to have a different pair for my mobile device
or work
Am Do 13.03.2014, 11:44:08 schrieb Martin Behrendt:
Hi,
I want to achieve the following:
1. A Master signing key
2. A subkey signing/enc pair for my normal machine
3. A subkey signing/enc pair for e.g. my mobile device
This is not possible in a useful sense and furthermore it doesn't make
Hi Martin--
On 03/13/2014 06:44 AM, Martin Behrendt wrote:
I want to achieve the following:
1. A Master signing key
2. A subkey signing/enc pair for my normal machine
3. A subkey signing/enc pair for e.g. my mobile device
Now the following problem arises (at least from the reading I have
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Martin Behrendt
martin-gnupg-us...@dkyb.de wrote:Hi,
I want to achieve the following:
1. A Master signing key
2. A subkey signing/enc pair for my normal machine
3. A subkey signing/enc pair for e.g. my mobile device
What I want to do is to have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 13.03.2014 16:42, schrieb ved...@nym.hush.com:
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Martin Behrendt
martin-gnupg-us...@dkyb.de wrote:Hi,
I want to achieve the following: 1. A Master signing key 2. A
subkey signing/enc pair for my
On 03/13/2014 12:30 PM, Martin Behrendt wrote:
Am 13.03.2014 16:42, schrieb ved...@nym.hush.com:
= You can let all your correspondents know that they can
encrypt simultaneously to all 3 of your keys that have the same
e-mail address (assuming that you give them the fingerprints and
long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 13.03.2014 17:39, schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
what is the advantage of this approach? what threat are you trying
to defend against?
I'll work from the assumption that you are worried that an
attacker might compromise one of your
I still can read messages friend send me, which are only encrypted to
e.g. make mass surveillance harder.
Your proposed solution won't work. Sorry to be so blunt, but that's
the state of things.
So far there's no credible reporting that any government is doing mass
surveillance of email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
Hi
On Thursday 13 March 2014 at 2:31:06 PM, in
mid:1730446.9J4b6oayU7@inno, Hauke Laging wrote:
gpg --recipient 0xD4BC64B8\!
I've never see it with a backslash before the exclamation mark.
On 03/13/2014 06:17 PM, MFPA wrote:
On Thursday 13 March 2014 at 2:31:06 PM, in
mid:1730446.9J4b6oayU7@inno, Hauke Laging wrote:
gpg --recipient 0xD4BC64B8\!
I've never see it with a backslash before the exclamation mark.
What does the backslash add?
it tells your shell to avoid
Am Do 13.03.2014, 22:17:08 schrieb MFPA:
gpg --recipient 0xD4BC64B8\!
I've never see it with a backslash before the exclamation mark.
What does the backslash add?
That has nothing to do with GnuPG it is for the Shell.
man bash:
History expansions are introduced by the appearance of the
On Mar 13, 2014, at 6:17 PM, MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message
Hi
On Thursday 13 March 2014 at 2:31:06 PM, in
mid:1730446.9J4b6oayU7@inno, Hauke Laging wrote:
28 matches
Mail list logo