-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 27 December 2013 at 2:22:25 PM, in
, MFPA wrote:
> I suspect importing keys didn't work for me. I saw no
> changes in the UI.
I think something in my gpg.conf may have been the problem, as it sort
of went away shortly after I rena
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Friday 27 December 2013 at 4:31:08 AM, in
, Alice Bob wrote:
> I did try it on XP without
> noticeable problems. Besides the 'unexpected'
> behavior, did you have any other issues?
The only clickable items are Help, public key, private key
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:00, je...@seibercom.net said:
> I certainly don't want to start a flame war here; however, if you are so
> unequivocally anti proprietary software, then why do you even allow a
> version of your product to be created that will run on it. That is
If you mean why we create so
> Maybe you have written this for a newer Windows version than my XP.I did try
> it on XP without noticeable problems. Besides the 'unexpected' behavior, did
> you have any other issues?
> But the key has the
> unexpected UID
Yes, if you don't specify a name a 'random' one will be chosen for you,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Wednesday 25 December 2013 at 12:49:47 PM, in
, Alice Bob wrote:
> I wanted
> something to quickly load the key, encrypt the message,
> and send it away. It is closed source, unlimited
> trialware. Ty.
Maybe you have written this for a n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Wednesday 25 December 2013 at 10:05:43 PM, in
, Doug Barton wrote:
> Not to mention it's dramatically more difficult (some
> would argue impossible) to develop trust in a
> pseudonym.
I say it makes no difference whether somebody goes by
I really wish people would read my emails before responding to them.
> I certainly don't want to start a flame war here; however, if you
> are so unequivocally anti proprietary software...
I'm not, as I said in that message -- a part which you quoted, even:
>> I don't find closed-source software
On 26-12-2013 13:00, Jerry wrote:
> I certainly don't want to start a flame war here; however, if you are so
> unequivocally anti proprietary software, then why do you even allow a
> version of your product to be created that will run on it. That is
> certainly not a consistent approach.
Most peo
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 19:04:22 -0500, Ryan Sawhill stated:
> > I wanted to create an easy to use gui for GnuPG. Without installing,
> > choosing options, and just working from the get-go.
>
> I appreciate your sentiment but I absolutely agree with what everyone
> else has said. Expecting people to
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 12:50:50 -0500, Robert J. Hansen stated:
> On 12/25/2013 7:49 AM, Alice Bob wrote:
> > It is closed source, unlimited trialware.
>
> (a) If you're asking people to provide feedback and bug reports for
> closed-source software, you're asking people to help you make a buck
> wit
> I wanted to create an easy to use gui for GnuPG. Without installing,
> choosing options, and just working from the get-go.
I appreciate your sentiment but I absolutely agree with what everyone else
has said. Expecting people to use closed-source crypto software in 2013
would be a little like exp
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 18:30:29 +
Alice Bob wrote:
> Yep those are all valid points, and the issue of closed source vs
> open source vs crypto has been discussed many times before encreep,
> and there is nothing new for me to add on that. I personally use a
> lot of closed software on my machine
On 12/25/2013 09:50 AM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
(c) The web page asks, "Can I trust you?", and you answer it with
"YES!". Sorry, but no. The only correct answer to "Can I trust you?"
is, "You need to figure that out for yourself." In my experience,
people who answer that question "yes" are usu
Yep those are all valid points, and the issue of closed source vs open source
vs crypto has been discussed many times before encreep, and there is nothing
new for me to add on that.
I personally use a lot of closed software on my machine, it does not bother me
as much.
On 12/25/2013 7:49 AM, Alice Bob wrote:
> It is closed source, unlimited trialware.
(a) If you're asking people to provide feedback and bug reports for
closed-source software, you're asking people to help you make a buck
without giving them much of anything in return. I find that unethical.
I do
On 12/25/2013 06:49 AM, Alice Bob wrote:
> I wanted to create an easy to use gui for GnuPG. Without installing,
> choosing options, and just working from the get-go.
>
> I appreciate any feedback (and bugs), you can check it at:
> https://www.encreep.com
>
> The main use case is for encrypting/
I wanted to create an easy to use gui for GnuPG. Without installing, choosing
options, and just working from the get-go.
I appreciate any feedback (and bugs), you can check it at:
https://www.encreep.com
The main use case is for encrypting/decrypting, and not identity verification.
That is wh
17 matches
Mail list logo
