On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 18:03, 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net said:
But it would not import the ECC subkey, and the output simply told me
skipped subkey. I suppose this would be because, as you said, the
subkey binding signature could not be verified.
Correct.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 25 September 2014 at 7:12:12 PM, in
mid:54245afc.3030...@gmail.com, Murphy wrote:
On 09/25/2014 01:06 PM, MFPA wrote:
Other than whether GnuPG 1.x locks up on encountering
the unrecognised key type when trying to encrypt, or
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:21, 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net said:
And I wonder whether 1.4.x could cope with RSA subkeys on an ECC main
key.
No, it won't be able to handle such a key. It is not possible to verify
the user-id and subkey binding signatures which are done by the primary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 27 September 2014 at 3:31:38 PM, in
mid:87k34pi185@vigenere.g10code.de, Werner Koch wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 16:21,
2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net said:
And I wonder whether 1.4.x could cope with RSA subkeys
on
On 2014-09-25, Werner Koch wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:56, lech...@wi.uni-muenster.de said:
This is what happens if I extract gnupg-2.1.0-beta834.tar.bz2 and
execute that command on Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS.
Hmmm. The first call to gnupg's autogen.sh is
./autogen.sh --silent --print-build
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:56, lech...@wi.uni-muenster.de said:
This is what happens if I extract gnupg-2.1.0-beta834.tar.bz2 and
execute that command on Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS.
Hmmm. The first call to gnupg's autogen.sh is
./autogen.sh --silent --print-build
can you please run it to see whether
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:12, robe...@broadcom.com said:
This might be off topic, but the thread mentions Fedora. Can you
please tell me how easy it would be to produce a GPG2 stable RPM for
Fedora? Currently they only supply GPG1 as an option from Yum. I would
really like to get them to produce
On 2014-09-18, Werner Koch wrote:
To quickly build all required software without installing it, the
Speedo method may be used:
make -f build-aux/speedo.mk native
I get this:
--8---cut here---start-8---
autogen.sh: cross compiler kit not installed
:858-361-2068
-Original Message-
From: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 12:23 AM
To: Bob (Robert) Cavanaugh
Cc: Murphy; gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: New beta
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:12, robe...@broadcom.com said:
This might be off topic
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:29, lech...@wi.uni-muenster.de said:
make -f build-aux/speedo.mk native
I get this:
autogen.sh: cross compiler kit not installed
You seem to be building for Windows but I wonder how you did this given that
TARGETOS=native WHAT=release WITH_GUI=0 all
TARGETOS is
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:59, pe...@digitalbrains.com said:
What is the net effect when GnuPG 1.4 encounters, for example, such a key:
RSA pubkey with Certify and Sign capabilities
RSA subkey with Encrypt capability, created 2014-04-01
ECC subkey with Encrypt capability, created 2014-09-21
Thank you for this clear example!
Luckily, it behaves as you would hope, picking the valid subkey it can
use and ignoring the one it can't.
Cheers,
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 03:47, mac3...@gmail.com said:
for me I cannot then get it to perform its duty. I execute the
suggested command
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd)/PLAY/inst/lib
typed exactly as written above, and then nothing happens. gpg2
continues to execute as the previously installed version.
: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: New beta
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 03:47, mac3...@gmail.com said:
for me I cannot then get it to perform its duty. I execute the
suggested command
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd)/PLAY/inst/lib
typed exactly as written above, and then nothing happens. gpg2
continues
On 20/09/14 17:06, Werner Koch wrote:
But given that 1.4 is not able to parse ECC keys the selection process can't
consider an ECC key in the first place.
What is the net effect when GnuPG 1.4 encounters, for example, such a key:
RSA pubkey with Certify and Sign capabilities
RSA subkey with
On 20/09/14 16:23, Murphy wrote:
What, please, is the reason for the step no. 2 in the above list ?
This is a command to prevent gnome from hijacking pinentry. Without
it or something like it error messages are generated during execution
of the gpg2 command. I forget who suggested it but I
. The virtualbox environment is
perfect for experimenting with new beta versions and playing with ECC
keys and subkeys, without disturbing you regular production environment.
Murphy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iJwEAQECAAYFAlQfLbMACgkQUVKxkWZz2Q25uQP9GgJikeZPNYVBYQ2Gkzr4OP7r
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:15, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
It would be nice if it could also be checked with Fedora. CentOS/RHEL
My idea was to check that the required software is available and not to
check for a certain distribution. One major problem has always been
that the mingw toolchain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Saturday 20 September 2014 at 1:13:27 AM, in
mid:541cc6a7.9040...@gmail.com, Murphy wrote:
Of course your milage may vary, machine blow up and
hard drive autowipe. But it works for me and it is
definitely worth it to play with all the
On 20/09/14 02:13, Murphy wrote:
For my Ubuntu
machine hHere is a brief summary of the steps, in order
1. Install latest libraries: npth, libgpg-error, libgcrypt, libksba,
libassuan
2. Execute the following command: sudo ln -sf /dev/null
/etc/xdg/autostart/gnome-keyring-gpg.desktop
3.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/09/14 10:20, Murphy wrote:
What, please, is the reason for the step no. 2 in the above list ?
This is a command to prevent gnome from hijacking pinentry. Without
it or something like it error messages are generated during execution
of the
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:57, 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net said:
If you add an ECC subkey to an RSA or DSA mainkey, does GnuPG 1.4.x or
2.0.x ignore it and revert to the next newest subkey? Or does
It should do so; if not it is a bug which needs to be fixed soon. But
given that 1.4 is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am definitely having fun with Speedo. After playing around with it
in a virtual box Ubuntu environment I can see the advantage. It
immediately downloads and installs the required libraries as
advertised and builds an executable gpg2 in PLAY/inst/.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi
On Thursday 18 September 2014 at 5:41:21 PM, in
mid:87r3z87ufi@vigenere.g10code.de, Werner Koch wrote:
If you have all required tools and some extra source
packages in ../tarballs, you may also build a Windows
installer:
make -f
Does this have to be done under Linux, or can it be done under
Windows with the aid of something like MinGW or CodeBlocks?
Unfortunately, this is not something I'd recommend for anyone except a
handful of MinGW experts. It's technically possible, but daunting.
The approved way of building
On 9/19/2014 at 2:18 PM, Robert J. Hansen r...@sixdemonbag.org wrote:
Does this have to be done under Linux, or can it be done under
Windows with the aid of something like MinGW or CodeBlocks?
Unfortunately, this is not something I'd recommend for anyone
except a
handful of MinGW experts.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:14, r...@sixdemonbag.org said:
The approved way of building Win32 executables of GnuPG is to
cross-compile from Linux.
and best on Debian Wheezy or Jessie. I plan to eventually add some
checks into the Makefile to suggest what to install.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
and best on Debian Wheezy or Jessie. I plan to eventually add some
checks into the Makefile to suggest what to install.
It would be nice if it could also be checked with Fedora. CentOS/RHEL
is really big in the business world, and I know a couple of shops that
would like to be able to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In response to vedaal's question - installation of gnupg v2.1 is
significantly different from v1.x and even v2.0. For my Ubuntu
machine hHere is a brief summary of the steps, in order
1. Install latest libraries: npth, libgpg-error, libgcrypt,
Hi,
I just uploaded a new beta:
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gnupg/unstable/gnupg-2.1.0-beta834.tar.bz2
ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gnupg/unstable/gnupg-2.1.0-beta834.tar.bz2.sig
Noteworthy changes in version 2.1.0-beta834 (2014-09-18
On Friday 06 June 2014 at 17:39:44, Werner Koch wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 13:22, bernh...@intevation.de said:
Seriously for Werner (and some others) it is hard to know
at what point information is missing where by whom.
Actually I know the problem. GnuPG-2 requires a lot of libraries and
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:31, bernh...@intevation.de said:
A dependency diagram would be cool to have! :)
That is easy. Build in this order:
speedo_spkgs = \
libgpg-error npth libgcrypt \
zlib libiconv gettext \
libassuan libksba gnupg \
libffi glib pkg-config \
. It has been
released to give you the opportunity to check out new features and
a new beta was due anyway after 30 months.
If you need a stable and fully maintained version of GnuPG,
you should use version 2.0.23 or 1.4.16.
This versions is marked as BETA and as such it should
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 00:49, kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com
said:
Congratulations on the beta release, it is good to see this
development continuing steadily and I can confirm that it is working
rather nicely.
Well, LDAP keyserver support has not yet been implemented. But that
is
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:18, w...@gnupg.org said:
Ooops. How does that come? My test build shows 2.1.0-beta442 as to be
Never mind. I just replicated it while hacking on the new Windows
installer.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org wrote:
Hello!
I just released the fourth *beta version* of GnuPG 2.1. It has been
released to give you the opportunity to check out new features and
a new beta was due anyway after 30 months.
Dear Werner,
Congratulations
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 10:13, nicholas.c...@gmail.com said:
I just wonder if anyone would have time to put together a HOW-TO for
people building GnuPG 2.1 and all of its associated libraries from
source. For those of us who don't do this often, this is currently a
I know. That is my Marcus
On Friday 06 June 2014 at 10:13:23, Nicholas Cole wrote:
I just wonder if anyone would have time to put together a HOW-TO for
people building GnuPG 2.1 and all of its associated libraries from
source.
The tarball already has the documentation.
Maybe we should place more hints in the
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 13:22, bernh...@intevation.de said:
Seriously for Werner (and some others) it is hard to know
at what point information is missing where by whom.
Actually I know the problem. GnuPG-2 requires a lot of libraries and
they all need to be build and installed in a certain
After working with GnuPG 2.1 for over a year now, its great to see it in beta!
Let's try to sync up the Android build with the official 2.1 release, so the
2.1 final release can include new support for a very popular platform :)
That should be pretty straightforward since it has been building
Hello!
I just released the fourth *beta version* of GnuPG 2.1. It has been
released to give you the opportunity to check out new features and
a new beta was due anyway after 30 months.
If you need a stable and fully maintained version of GnuPG,
you should use version 2.0.23 or 1.4.16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/05/2014 05:55 PM, Werner Koch wrote:
Hello!
I just released the fourth *beta version* of GnuPG 2.1. It has
been released to give you the opportunity to check out new features
and a new beta was due anyway after 30 months.
If you need
42 matches
Mail list logo
